MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2235370872

Overweight and Obesity in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Findings Consistent with Typically Developing Children

2014· article· en· W2235370872 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sabrina N. Grondhuis

Bibliographic record

VenueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTypically developingAutismOverweightObesityPsychologyMedicineDevelopmental psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Childhood overweight and obesity are considerable problems both in the United States and worldwide.These abnormal weight categories are often accompanied by increased physical and mental health complications including diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular issues, and depression.Most concerning, elevated body mass in childhood generally leads to elevated body mass in adulthood, which is associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality.Youth with intellectual or developmental disabilities, such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), appear to be at heightened risk for overweight and obesity due to high medication use, atypical eating habits, and sedentary behavior.Previous literature is mixed as to whether these children actually have higher prevalence rates of overweight and obesity, although the methodology associated with some studies has been subpar due to use of parent-derived height and weight, and small sample sizes.This dissertation was designed to investigate the prevalence of abnormal weight in children with ASD, and to identify what variables were associated with elevated body mass.The sample comprised children from the United States and Canada who visited a hospital or clinic that was part of the Autism Treatment Network.In this sample, 32.9% of the children were overweight and 17.3% were obese, which was not significantly different from the rates of elevated body mass in typically developing children or from some previous studies of children with ASD.iii Multiple hierarchical regression models were run to analyze the data from a variety of perspectives, while trying to avoid confounds such as prescribed medication, different Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) age versions, and clinical site.The most successful model was called "Atheoretical Empiricism," and it found that Asian heritage, high levels of paternal education, stimulant use, atomoxetine use, high scores of the Anxious/Depressed CBCL subscale, and having a pervasive developmental disorder -not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS) diagnosis were associated with lower BMI percentile.Hispanic heritage, SSRI use, alpha 2 agonist use, high scores on the Sleep Disordered Breathing subscale of the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire, and elevated scores of the CBCL Aggressive Behavior subscale and Withdrawn/Depressed subscale were associated with higher BMI percentile (greater likelihood of being overweight or obese).The variance accounted for declined when the more specific theory-driven investigations were conducted.The model had a better fit for older children whose parents completed the 6-18 year CBCL version rather than younger children whose parents completed the 1.5-5 year version.When evaluated by specific ASD diagnosis, the model fit best for children with PDD-NOS.There were great variations between model fit across sites; data from two Northeastern sites accounted for more variance (13.5% for Site 23 and 17.1% for Site 2) than any of the previous manipulations.Although far less variance was accounted for than initially hoped, variance levels in this study were consistent with amounts from other investigations.This study confirmed that several of the predictors for overweight and obesity in the neurotypical population held true for children with ASD.Future directions for research and weight-related interventions were discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)Same topicChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFrench-language works237,207