MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W223864388

Defending the Queen: Wollstonecraft and Stael on the Politics of Sensibility and Feminine Difference

2002· article· en· W223864388 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lori J. Marso

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œEighteenth century/˜The œeighteenth century (Lubbock, Tex. Online) · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueReligion, Gender, and Enlightenment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSensibilityPoliticsQueen (butterfly)FemininityJuryTribunalHistoryVerdictGender studiesLiteratureLawSociologyArtPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I shall therefore only speak of that verdict, analyzing the political, in telling what I have seen, what I know of the queen, and in depicting the hideous circumstances which have led to her condemnation. (1) GERMAINE DE STAEL, Reflections on the Trial of the Queen, a Woman, August 1793 STAEL'S essay in defense of Marie Antoinette at the time of her trial was initially published anonymously as authored only by a woman. Stael's identification of herself as a woman is significant. The Revolutionary criminal Tribunal, consisting of a male jury and nine male judges, ultimately decided Marie Antoinette's fate, yet the lower-class of Paris were among her most notorious and vicious enemies. Indeed, the first time that organized politically was to march to Versailles in October 1789 to demand that the royal couple guarantee bread to the people and approve the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the citizen. The direct confrontation between the Queen of France and the mostly lower-class Parisian who marched to Versailles to capture the queen serves as a political moment peculiarly open to a variety of readings. In this essay, I am particularly interested in analyzing the readings of the two female political theorists who write about this event, Mary Wollstonecraft and Germaine de Stael. As a feminist working in the field of political theory, I am drawn to specific historical moments and literary metaphors that function within theoretical texts as sites where ideas of femininity (as well as masculinity) are (re)produced and mediated. I have isolated the October 1789 Women's March to Versailles and the August 1793 trial of Marie Antoinette to be studied here because the status of femininity and women's role in are at the center of each event. The Women's March was the first moment in the Revolution that came together as a group of in order to act politically and make demands of their sovereigns. (2) One of these sovereigns is a woman who herself will be slandered and executed for stepping outside the role of proper femininity. In the bill of indictment against Marie Antoinette at her trial, she is accused of squandering public monies, siphoning money to Austria, and most outrageously, of engaging in incest with her son. A host of contemporary feminist scholars have studied the ways in which Marie Antoinette's status as queen symbolized, for revolutionaries, the feminization and corruption of the Old Regime. Propaganda at the time painted Marie Antoinette as woman, foreigner, prostitute, adulteress, and coquette. (3) And indeed, her trial and execution in August 1793 marks the moment after which all possibilities for women's formal participation in were closed off. Thus, we see the interpretive and political perils of these historical events for writers who sought to advance women's potential role in the New Republic. Marie Antoinette, the female victim said to symbolize the feminine excess of the aristocracy, is attacked lower-class market testing and enacting their newly found political power. How was the woman writer to understand the potential role of in and notions of the feminine when faced with such contradictory behavior of and diverse meaning attached to the feminine? To attempt to analyze the role of women in these events, one becomes increasingly drawn into an eighteenth-century discursive dynamic that Gunther-Canada has called the politics of sense and (4) Simply put, sensibility was identified with female virtues of sympathetic feeling, empathetic behavior, and romanticism; sense was associated with masculine rational discourse as exemplified in Enlightenment philosophy. Negotiating the gendered of sens e and sensibility proved to be significant challenge for who wished to see gender inequality alleviated. To continue to view and define the feminine self through the lens of sensibility was to run the risk of identifying with the very qualities that had been said to justify their exclusion from in the first place. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,034
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,084

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0160,067
Communication savante0,0130,008
Science ouverte0,0010,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,010
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œEighteenth century/˜The œeighteenth century (Lubbock, Tex. Online)Même sujetReligion, Gender, and EnlightenmentTravaux en français237 207