MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2239337795 · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2355

What keeps you strong? How primary healthcare and aged care services can support the wellbeing of older Indigenous peoples: a systematic literature review protocol

2015· article· en· W2239337795 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carol Davy, Elaine Kite, Graham Aitken, Garth Dodd, Janice Rigney, Jenny Hayes, Jan Van Emden

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNational Medical Research CouncilNational Health and Medical Research Council
Mots-clésIndigenousPsychological interventionLife expectancyHealth careMedicineNursingDisadvantageGerontologyPsychologyPolitical sciencePopulationEnvironmental health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Review question/objective The primary objective of this review is to systematically examine scientific literature that reports on strategies or interventions that have been or could be developed, or have been used by primary healthcare or aged care services to support the wellbeing of older Indigenous peoples. More specifically the review questions are: What are the attitudes, beliefs, expectations, understandings, perceptions and experiences of older Indigenous peoples being supported by these strategies or interventions? What other strategies or interventions do Indigenous peoples believe primary healthcare or aged care services could implement to support the wellbeing of older Indigenous peoples? What are the attitudes, beliefs, expectations, understandings, perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare and aged care service providers who have developed or implemented these strategies or interventions? What other strategies or interventions do primary healthcare or aged care service providers believe could support the wellbeing of older Indigenous peoples? Background While often difficult to measure1, the life expectancy of Indigenous peoples from a number of different countries appears to be increasing. Between 2008 and 2012, the estimated life expectancy of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia, for example, increased from 63 to 65 years for males and from 72 to 73 years for females.2 For a variety of reasons, including reduction in deaths from injury and some chronic diseases, similar trends have also been noted in Canada, United States and New Zealand.3-6 Perhaps in some cases, for the first time governments are needing to consider how to support and provide services to an increasing number of older Indigenous peoples.7 In Australia, the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care Program recognizes and attempts to address these emerging needs.8 Population aging and its health implications is an important issue for Canada's Indigenous peoples, with many Aboriginal seniors being forced into cities due to the lack of healthcare services and facilities in their rural and northern communities.9 The Canadian Government is taking steps to improve services provided to their Indigenous peoples. The First Nations and Inuit Home and Community Care program developed and implemented in the late 1990s, for example, focuses on case management, nursing care at home, some respite care and personal care service options.10 However, many of the current programs aimed at supporting older Indigenous peoples fail to address the issues which are deterring people from accessing these programs.2 A number of factors have been found to act as a barrier to Indigenous peoples seeking care, including language, affordability and problems navigating the healthcare system. For many Indigenous peoples, cultural issues also exacerbate these barriers.9,11 Health, for example, is not just about being free from illness, but for Indigenous peoples, is also a balance between physical, mental, emotional, cultural and spiritual wellbeing12-14 which is often not supported by western approaches.15 The particular focus on a biomedical model of care, rather than one that incorporates the central importance of family, kinship, community and Country, may be neither appropriate for nor acceptable to older Indigenous peoples.16,17 Discrimination and racism17, and the lasting effects of colonization, further contribute to the likelihood that older Indigenous peoples will be reluctant to utilize mainstream primary healthcare and aged care services.18 At the healthcare service level, improving understandings of Indigenous peoples' cultures and the factors that support their concepts of wellbeing is likely to improve the quality of care.19 At the same time, encouraging a more holistic concept of health which considers and accounts for the heterogeneity between and within Indigenous communities will encourage the uptake of services by older peoples.20 This may decrease preventable hospital admissions and associated costs to the healthcare system.21-23 Healthcare services that support the wellbeing as well as the acceptability of services for Indigenous peoples have a number of additional benefits. Providing effective and acceptable community centered care will mean that Indigenous peoples are able to live at home for as long as possible, thereby ensuring the presence of valuable community role models for younger people.24 In turn, remaining within or at least close to their communities provides an opportunity for family members who often encourage people to engage with care25 to contribute to and support the effective management of the older Indigenous peoples' health.26,27 Initial searches suggest there are a number of primarily qualitative studies28-33 which have attempted to understand how primary healthcare and aged care services can better support the wellbeing of Indigenous peoples in, for example, Australia34, East Asia and South East Asia35, and South Africa.36 Findings from these studies suggest that maintaining close connections with family and community members30-33,37-43 as well as continuing to celebrate spirituality, Country and culture29,40,43,44 may be particularly important for supporting the wellbeing of older Indigenous peoples. To our knowledge, however, this is the first systematic review that will identify and then synthesize evidence about what could support the wellbeing of older Indigenous peoples.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,012
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,542
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0120,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,377
Écart entre enseignants0,343 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation ReportsMême sujetIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsTravaux en français237 207