MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2239337795 · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2355

What keeps you strong? How primary healthcare and aged care services can support the wellbeing of older Indigenous peoples: a systematic literature review protocol

2015· article· en· W2239337795 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carol Davy, Elaine Kite, Graham Aitken, Garth Dodd, Janice Rigney, Jenny Hayes, Jan Van Emden

Bibliographic record

VenueThe JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Medical Research CouncilNational Health and Medical Research Council
KeywordsIndigenousPsychological interventionLife expectancyHealth careMedicineNursingDisadvantageGerontologyPsychologyPolitical sciencePopulationEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review question/objective The primary objective of this review is to systematically examine scientific literature that reports on strategies or interventions that have been or could be developed, or have been used by primary healthcare or aged care services to support the wellbeing of older Indigenous peoples. More specifically the review questions are: What are the attitudes, beliefs, expectations, understandings, perceptions and experiences of older Indigenous peoples being supported by these strategies or interventions? What other strategies or interventions do Indigenous peoples believe primary healthcare or aged care services could implement to support the wellbeing of older Indigenous peoples? What are the attitudes, beliefs, expectations, understandings, perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare and aged care service providers who have developed or implemented these strategies or interventions? What other strategies or interventions do primary healthcare or aged care service providers believe could support the wellbeing of older Indigenous peoples? Background While often difficult to measure1, the life expectancy of Indigenous peoples from a number of different countries appears to be increasing. Between 2008 and 2012, the estimated life expectancy of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia, for example, increased from 63 to 65 years for males and from 72 to 73 years for females.2 For a variety of reasons, including reduction in deaths from injury and some chronic diseases, similar trends have also been noted in Canada, United States and New Zealand.3-6 Perhaps in some cases, for the first time governments are needing to consider how to support and provide services to an increasing number of older Indigenous peoples.7 In Australia, the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care Program recognizes and attempts to address these emerging needs.8 Population aging and its health implications is an important issue for Canada's Indigenous peoples, with many Aboriginal seniors being forced into cities due to the lack of healthcare services and facilities in their rural and northern communities.9 The Canadian Government is taking steps to improve services provided to their Indigenous peoples. The First Nations and Inuit Home and Community Care program developed and implemented in the late 1990s, for example, focuses on case management, nursing care at home, some respite care and personal care service options.10 However, many of the current programs aimed at supporting older Indigenous peoples fail to address the issues which are deterring people from accessing these programs.2 A number of factors have been found to act as a barrier to Indigenous peoples seeking care, including language, affordability and problems navigating the healthcare system. For many Indigenous peoples, cultural issues also exacerbate these barriers.9,11 Health, for example, is not just about being free from illness, but for Indigenous peoples, is also a balance between physical, mental, emotional, cultural and spiritual wellbeing12-14 which is often not supported by western approaches.15 The particular focus on a biomedical model of care, rather than one that incorporates the central importance of family, kinship, community and Country, may be neither appropriate for nor acceptable to older Indigenous peoples.16,17 Discrimination and racism17, and the lasting effects of colonization, further contribute to the likelihood that older Indigenous peoples will be reluctant to utilize mainstream primary healthcare and aged care services.18 At the healthcare service level, improving understandings of Indigenous peoples' cultures and the factors that support their concepts of wellbeing is likely to improve the quality of care.19 At the same time, encouraging a more holistic concept of health which considers and accounts for the heterogeneity between and within Indigenous communities will encourage the uptake of services by older peoples.20 This may decrease preventable hospital admissions and associated costs to the healthcare system.21-23 Healthcare services that support the wellbeing as well as the acceptability of services for Indigenous peoples have a number of additional benefits. Providing effective and acceptable community centered care will mean that Indigenous peoples are able to live at home for as long as possible, thereby ensuring the presence of valuable community role models for younger people.24 In turn, remaining within or at least close to their communities provides an opportunity for family members who often encourage people to engage with care25 to contribute to and support the effective management of the older Indigenous peoples' health.26,27 Initial searches suggest there are a number of primarily qualitative studies28-33 which have attempted to understand how primary healthcare and aged care services can better support the wellbeing of Indigenous peoples in, for example, Australia34, East Asia and South East Asia35, and South Africa.36 Findings from these studies suggest that maintaining close connections with family and community members30-33,37-43 as well as continuing to celebrate spirituality, Country and culture29,40,43,44 may be particularly important for supporting the wellbeing of older Indigenous peoples. To our knowledge, however, this is the first systematic review that will identify and then synthesize evidence about what could support the wellbeing of older Indigenous peoples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation ReportsSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207