Examining the Alignment of the IOC's Environmental Code of Conduct for Athletes within a Varsity Athletic Program
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 2006 International Olympic Committee (IOC) released code of conduct for athletes to act as role models in protecting and promoting environmental sustainability. The code outlined IOC expectations that athletes be environmental role models. Within code, IOC identified six environmental concerns and stated specific actions that athletes could undertake in their role as environmentalists. This study investigated meanings and interpretations attributed by varsity student athletes, coaches, and administrators at medium sized Canadian university to code of conduct. The study sought to reveal how participants conceptualized and enacted IOC corporate social responsibility program in environmentalism. Then, results were applied to student-athlete role model or mentoring programs and education in environmentalism was deemed to be warranted. Definition of Role Model In this study agent or role model is defined as being as exemplary or worthy of imitation. (1) Role models have been deemed an essential component of socializing process. (2) As part of this process, use of role models is considered a powerful means of transmitting values, attitudes and patterns of thought and behavior, (3) and can influence purchases. (4) Student-athletes have been utilized as role models to positively influence others within communities. (5) Definition of Corporate Social Responsibility This research study utilized two accepted views of corporate social responsibility (CSR), those of Brown and Dacin, (6) and of Smith. (7) Brown and Dacin's definition focused on organizational status and activities with respect to its perceived societal obligations. (8) Smith expanded role of organization to include the obligations of firm to society or, more specifically, firm's stakeholders--those affected by corporate policies and practices. (9) In this study, IOC code related to environmental societal obligations to society and influence of their policies and environmental expectations in terms of athlete behaviour. The Rise of Corporate Social Responsibility Over past two decades, CSR has become element of service on agenda of corporations (10) due to growing corporate concern about social conditions. (11) Another impetus for corporate participation is that consumers identify with organizations that support CSR initiatives. (12) The development of identity with corporate image encourages social response. A response to CSR initiatives involves encouragement of consumers and members of organization to acknowledge and react to social issue. (13) A response should provide motivation to meet contemporary challenge by modifying one's behaviour. (14) To develop positive response to CSR initiative, Bhattcharya and Sen suggest respondents meet four key elements: awareness, attribution, attitude and attachment. Developing awareness of CSR initiative is first element for success, and, according to Bhattcharya and Sen, when companies put their advertising and promotional muscle behind specific causes, awareness of that cause is likely to increase. (15) The second element, attribution, involves examining the extent to which consumers are likely to react positively to company's CSR activities. (16) The third element, attitude, constitutes one's of particular CSR initiative. Gold indicates value of proposition predicts his or her [the respondent's] behavior. (17) The fourth and final element, attachment, facilitates or strengthens connection consumers feel with companies engaging in CSR activities. (18) A high level of support or attachment to CSR initiative requires awareness of initiative, attribution or positive reaction, and positive attitude to engaging with cause. Today, many companies have commitment to CSR initiatives. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».