Breastfeeding and sexuality immediately post partum.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between breastfeeding and resumption of vaginal intercourse; to determine the association between these behaviours and age, parity, marital status, mode of delivery, and contraceptive use; and to identify factors associated with resumption of intercourse among Canadian women in the early postpartum period. DESIGN: Prospective survey. SETTING: Eleven obstetricians' offices in three Ontario communities between August and December 2002. PARTICIPANTS: Women attending their first postpartum visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Resumption of vaginal intercourse. RESULTS: Of 316 respondents, 181 (57.3%) were currently breastfeeding, and 167 (52.8%) had not yet resumed vaginal intercourse. Mean age of the mothers was 28.7 +/- 5.3 years; mean age of their babies was 6.5 +/- 1.1 weeks. This was a first child for 50.3% and a second child for 32.6%. Most women (72.8%) were married; another 19.3% were in common-law relationships. Married women were more likely to breastfeed (P = .001), as were those with higher parity (P = .008). Multivariable logistic regression identified five variables significantly associated with resumption of intercourse by 6 weeks post partum. The two most statistically significant variables were breastfeeding (exclusively or supplementing with bottle) and baby's age in weeks (P < .001 for both). Mode of delivery (vaginal delivery with no tearing, compared with cesarean section or vaginal delivery with tearing) was also a highly significant predictor (P = .003), as was higher parity (P = .003). Older maternal age was weakly associated with resumption of intercourse (P = .049). The 167 women who had not resumed intercourse were asked to indicate their main reasons: 161 responded, citing a total of 215 reasons (54 cited more than one reason). The most common reasons were lack of interest (18.6%), being too tired (16.8%), being afraid of intercourse being painful (16.8%), physician told them not to (15.6%), and thinking they should wait 6 weeks (14.4%). CONCLUSION: Breastfeeding women who delay resumption of intercourse during the postpartum period might benefit from open discussion of breastfeeding, sexuality, and contraception immediately post partum.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».