A Storm Over This Court: Law, Politics, and Supreme Court Decision Making in Brown v. Board of Education (2013) by Jeffrey D. Hockett
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Brown v. the Board of Education decision of 1954 is considered a watershed moment not only for U.S. legal history but also for that country's modern history.Often referred to simply as Brown, the decision is still considered one of the key events of the nation's history through the mid-20th century.The case was actually named after the first of five plaintiffs from around the American South and Midwest who petitioned the federal government for constitutional rights to equal public education.As such, Brown did mark a period of change in American race relations for the better.The decision's centrality to this history rings true especially in relation to the acclaimed campaigns for rights waged by African American communities throughout the U.S. South, where legal or Jim Crow racial segregation existed from the mid-to-late-19th century.Brown became the signpost for impending social change during the 1950s and culminated in the passage of civil rights legislation in 1964 and 1965.Collectively, this body of legal jurisprudence and congressional legislation ostensibly protected 14th Amendment rights once and for all.The march toward social change during this period was of course famously led by figures and organizations like Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and other church and student based movements who came to symbolize civil rights struggles in the United States to the world.The Brown decision did legally overturn the separate but equal doctrine that had been enshrined in the Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896 wherein Jim Crow forms of racial segregation in public accommodations, transit, restaurants, schools, etc., were enabled by the highest court of the land.After the Brown decision, ongoing racial inequalities rooted in longstanding forms of economic injustic continued.As such, many scholars of civil rights and education now look to broader chronologies, periodizations, and regional foci, notably through studies of racial injustice in northern urban areas where discrimination was more subtle, beyond the southern-based locales that Brown helped highlight (Hall, 2005).Still, because of its signal impact, the Brown decision remains a major point of departure and discussion for many about the history of this period.As a result of its prominence in various historical literatures, the Brown decision has attracted a great deal of attention.As
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».