MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2258841679 · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v61i2.55886

A Storm Over This Court: Law, Politics, and Supreme Court Decision Making in Brown v. Board of Education (2013) by Jeffrey D. Hockett

2016· article· en· W2258841679 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ian Rocksborough-Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLaw, Rights, and Freedoms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser Valley
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupreme courtLawPoliticsStormPolitical sciencePhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Brown v. the Board of Education decision of 1954 is considered a watershed moment not only for U.S. legal history but also for that country's modern history.Often referred to simply as Brown, the decision is still considered one of the key events of the nation's history through the mid-20th century.The case was actually named after the first of five plaintiffs from around the American South and Midwest who petitioned the federal government for constitutional rights to equal public education.As such, Brown did mark a period of change in American race relations for the better.The decision's centrality to this history rings true especially in relation to the acclaimed campaigns for rights waged by African American communities throughout the U.S. South, where legal or Jim Crow racial segregation existed from the mid-to-late-19th century.Brown became the signpost for impending social change during the 1950s and culminated in the passage of civil rights legislation in 1964 and 1965.Collectively, this body of legal jurisprudence and congressional legislation ostensibly protected 14th Amendment rights once and for all.The march toward social change during this period was of course famously led by figures and organizations like Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and other church and student based movements who came to symbolize civil rights struggles in the United States to the world.The Brown decision did legally overturn the separate but equal doctrine that had been enshrined in the Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896 wherein Jim Crow forms of racial segregation in public accommodations, transit, restaurants, schools, etc., were enabled by the highest court of the land.After the Brown decision, ongoing racial inequalities rooted in longstanding forms of economic injustic continued.As such, many scholars of civil rights and education now look to broader chronologies, periodizations, and regional foci, notably through studies of racial injustice in northern urban areas where discrimination was more subtle, beyond the southern-based locales that Brown helped highlight (Hall, 2005).Still, because of its signal impact, the Brown decision remains a major point of departure and discussion for many about the history of this period.As a result of its prominence in various historical literatures, the Brown decision has attracted a great deal of attention.As Jeffrey D. Hockett's A Storm Over This Court: Law, Politics, and Supreme Court Decision Making in Brown v. Board of Education (2013) demonstrates, interpretations of the case are invariably precise and highly focused in form since the scholarly work that needs to be marshaled in any new study of the subject is vast.Hockett's

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0430.037
Scholarly communication0.0330.012
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0250.031
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Journal of Educational ResearchSame topicLaw, Rights, and FreedomsFrench-language works237,207