MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2259789896 · doi:10.1353/nin.2014.0006

The Kid: The Immortal Life of Ted Williams by Ben Bradlee Jr. (review)

2014· article· en· W2259789896 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Douglas K. Lehman

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHEROBiographyNewspaperSoulArt historyHistoryArtSociologyMedia studiesLiteratureTheologyPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Kid: The Immortal Life of Ted Williams by Ben Bradlee Jr. Douglas K. Lehman Ben Bradlee Jr. The Kid: The Immortal Life of Ted Williams. New York: Little, Brown, 2013. 864 pp. Cloth, $35.00. Ben Bradlee Jr. has written what surely must be the definitive biography of Ted Williams. Nearly nine hundred pages in length, Bradlee’s book presents Ted Williams’s life with warts and all. While Williams was a hero to many on the ball field, in his private life he was a tormented soul who struggled to come to grips with his heritage and his relationships with women and his children. What Bradlee accomplishes is a portrayal of Williams as a human being, not a deity, a man who wanted to be the greatest hitter in the history of baseball and one who failed miserably as a husband and father. Bradlee begins this extensive tale of Williams’s life by exploring his heritage. Williams’s mother was born in Mexico, moved to San Diego, and was well-known for her work with the Salvation Army in that city. Yet according to Bradlee, Williams was ashamed of his parents and would rarely speak of them to the press. The subject of the press, especially the Boston newspaper sportswriters, takes up a great deal of the text of Bradlee’s book. While it has been fifty-three years since Williams retired as a player from the game, many baseball fans still know of his battles with the Boston press, including several well-publicized spitting instances. While Williams was single-minded in his quest to become the best hitter ever in baseball, he was extremely complex off the field. In some ways, he was a big kid who never grew up. Bradlee’s descriptions of his relations with the press are indications of this, but additional examples of his relationships [End Page 141] with his wives and the women in his life, as well as with his children, reveal an individual dealing with many demons. Williams was often profane, yet he frequently visited ill children in hospitals and was a champion of the Jimmy Fund, a charitable organization supporting the battle against cancer at Boston’s Dana Farber Cancer Institute. Williams would often show up in the middle of the night to visit the cancer-stricken children, and he made sure the press kept it quiet. In this, as in many other areas of his life, Williams shunned the spotlight. Bradlee had unprecedented access to files and people who knew Williams. Williams’s surviving daughter, Claudia, was especially important in Bradlee’s research. She provided him with access to Williams’s papers, files, records, letters, journals, fishing logs, and other important documents. Bradlee conducted a number of interviews with Claudia. He also had access to Williams’s older daughter, Bobby-Jo, prior to her death. Bradlee notes that they “provided important insights into growing up with Ted—his view of women, his anger, his insecurity and his record as a father. But perhaps the most significant thing she supplied was her family’s first full explanation, including many new details, of the cryonics affair” (7). Bradlee also was able to speak with two of Williams’s wives, Lee Howard and Dolores Williams. Williams’s son, JohnHenry, had agreed to talk with Bradlee but passed away before this could be accomplished. In addition, Bradlee interviewed family members from May Williams’s side of the family, and they provided additional information for this book. The level of research conducted by Bradlee is impressive and comprehensive. Can anything more be uncovered about this baseball legend? This is an extremely long book. Yet it is a well-written and structured book and an easy read. Bradlee, a former newspaper executive, keeps one reading to find out what happens next, despite the major facts of Williams’s life being relatively well-known. Bradlee pulls no punches in the book. Williams’s colorful use of the English language appears frequently throughout the book, but this is as it should be. Williams pulled no punches either in his dealings with the press, fans, and his family. The sudden temper tantrums come through even...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,493
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,986

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0150,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,195
Écart entre enseignants0,189 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207