MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2259789896 · doi:10.1353/nin.2014.0006

The Kid: The Immortal Life of Ted Williams by Ben Bradlee Jr. (review)

2014· article· en· W2259789896 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Douglas K. Lehman

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHEROBiographyNewspaperSoulArt historyHistoryArtSociologyMedia studiesLiteratureTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Kid: The Immortal Life of Ted Williams by Ben Bradlee Jr. Douglas K. Lehman Ben Bradlee Jr. The Kid: The Immortal Life of Ted Williams. New York: Little, Brown, 2013. 864 pp. Cloth, $35.00. Ben Bradlee Jr. has written what surely must be the definitive biography of Ted Williams. Nearly nine hundred pages in length, Bradlee’s book presents Ted Williams’s life with warts and all. While Williams was a hero to many on the ball field, in his private life he was a tormented soul who struggled to come to grips with his heritage and his relationships with women and his children. What Bradlee accomplishes is a portrayal of Williams as a human being, not a deity, a man who wanted to be the greatest hitter in the history of baseball and one who failed miserably as a husband and father. Bradlee begins this extensive tale of Williams’s life by exploring his heritage. Williams’s mother was born in Mexico, moved to San Diego, and was well-known for her work with the Salvation Army in that city. Yet according to Bradlee, Williams was ashamed of his parents and would rarely speak of them to the press. The subject of the press, especially the Boston newspaper sportswriters, takes up a great deal of the text of Bradlee’s book. While it has been fifty-three years since Williams retired as a player from the game, many baseball fans still know of his battles with the Boston press, including several well-publicized spitting instances. While Williams was single-minded in his quest to become the best hitter ever in baseball, he was extremely complex off the field. In some ways, he was a big kid who never grew up. Bradlee’s descriptions of his relations with the press are indications of this, but additional examples of his relationships [End Page 141] with his wives and the women in his life, as well as with his children, reveal an individual dealing with many demons. Williams was often profane, yet he frequently visited ill children in hospitals and was a champion of the Jimmy Fund, a charitable organization supporting the battle against cancer at Boston’s Dana Farber Cancer Institute. Williams would often show up in the middle of the night to visit the cancer-stricken children, and he made sure the press kept it quiet. In this, as in many other areas of his life, Williams shunned the spotlight. Bradlee had unprecedented access to files and people who knew Williams. Williams’s surviving daughter, Claudia, was especially important in Bradlee’s research. She provided him with access to Williams’s papers, files, records, letters, journals, fishing logs, and other important documents. Bradlee conducted a number of interviews with Claudia. He also had access to Williams’s older daughter, Bobby-Jo, prior to her death. Bradlee notes that they “provided important insights into growing up with Ted—his view of women, his anger, his insecurity and his record as a father. But perhaps the most significant thing she supplied was her family’s first full explanation, including many new details, of the cryonics affair” (7). Bradlee also was able to speak with two of Williams’s wives, Lee Howard and Dolores Williams. Williams’s son, JohnHenry, had agreed to talk with Bradlee but passed away before this could be accomplished. In addition, Bradlee interviewed family members from May Williams’s side of the family, and they provided additional information for this book. The level of research conducted by Bradlee is impressive and comprehensive. Can anything more be uncovered about this baseball legend? This is an extremely long book. Yet it is a well-written and structured book and an easy read. Bradlee, a former newspaper executive, keeps one reading to find out what happens next, despite the major facts of Williams’s life being relatively well-known. Bradlee pulls no punches in the book. Williams’s colorful use of the English language appears frequently throughout the book, but this is as it should be. Williams pulled no punches either in his dealings with the press, fans, and his family. The sudden temper tantrums come through even...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207