Comparative Study Between the Accuracy of Stand-Alone GPS, Maritime DGPS and ESTB
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the nineties, GPS receivers proliferated throughout the World, providing all-weather, continuous, global positioning to users with an accuracy of 100m or better. In order to improve the accuracy and the integrity of GPS, several differential techniques were developed. In fact, the transmission of differential corrections to the GPS signals allows elimination of most of the errors of GPS and improves significantly the integrity of the service. While GPS does not provide instantaneous integrity, the use of differential stations - which monitor permanently the signals of the visible satellites - enables the timely warning of any malfunction or failure in less than 10 seconds. Probably the most important means of delivering differential corrections to users have been through the old Non-Directional Beacons (technique generally referred to as maritime DGPS) and through geostationary satellites (technique generally referred to as space-based augmentation or wide area augmentation). During the last decade, maritime DGPS stations were installed by all European countries with Atlantic coastlines, as well as by Italy, Turkey, Canada, US, Bermuda, Panama, Brazil, Argentina, Australia, New Zealand, China (including Hong Kong), Taiwan, Japan, Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, India, Bangladesh and some of the Gulf states. Portugal has recently joined to these services, having installed 2 maritime DGPS stations, which are located at Cape Carvoeiro and Sagres. In terms of satellite based augmentations, the most important systems are the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) - developed at the United States; the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) - developed in Europe; and the Multi-function Satellite-based Augmentation System (MSAS) - developed in Japan. Although EGNOS is not scheduled to be fully operational until 2004, the EGNOS System Test Bed (ESTB), a simplified version of EGNOS available within Europe, began transmitting signals, via an INMARSAT satellite, to potential users in February 2000. Differential systems provide important services to users, but their accuracy advantage, when compared to stand-alone GPS, has decreased significantly due to the discontinuation of Selective Availability (SA), in the 1st of May 2000, which led to an improvement in stand-alone GPS accuracy. Presently, the main benefit of augmentation services is the integrity, which gives users an extra-assurance that the position is correct. Nevertheless, the extra accuracy afforded by differential services (like maritime DGPS and EGNOS) is still extremely important in some maritime applications (such as dredging, hydrographic surveying, buoy positioning, safety of life applications and, particularly, some phases of pilotage waters navigation, including harbour manoeuvres), in some aeronautical applications (namely en-route navigation, landing and air traffic control) and also in land applications (namely positive train control and inland waterways navigation). Therefore, the authors present a comparative study between the accuracy of stand-alone GPS, maritime DGPS and ESTB. The authors evaluate the standard positioning accuracy and discuss the potential benefits gained from the two afore-mentioned augmentation services.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».