MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2261321643

Comparative Study Between the Accuracy of Stand-Alone GPS, Maritime DGPS and ESTB

2003· article· en· W2261321643 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Terry Moore, Christopher Hill, L.S. Monteiro

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 16th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS/GNSS 2003) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemDifferential GPSGeostationary orbitGeographySatelliteRemote sensingComputer scienceMeteorologyTelecommunicationsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the nineties, GPS receivers proliferated throughout the World, providing all-weather, continuous, global positioning to users with an accuracy of 100m or better. In order to improve the accuracy and the integrity of GPS, several differential techniques were developed. In fact, the transmission of differential corrections to the GPS signals allows elimination of most of the errors of GPS and improves significantly the integrity of the service. While GPS does not provide instantaneous integrity, the use of differential stations - which monitor permanently the signals of the visible satellites - enables the timely warning of any malfunction or failure in less than 10 seconds. Probably the most important means of delivering differential corrections to users have been through the old Non-Directional Beacons (technique generally referred to as maritime DGPS) and through geostationary satellites (technique generally referred to as space-based augmentation or wide area augmentation). During the last decade, maritime DGPS stations were installed by all European countries with Atlantic coastlines, as well as by Italy, Turkey, Canada, US, Bermuda, Panama, Brazil, Argentina, Australia, New Zealand, China (including Hong Kong), Taiwan, Japan, Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, India, Bangladesh and some of the Gulf states. Portugal has recently joined to these services, having installed 2 maritime DGPS stations, which are located at Cape Carvoeiro and Sagres. In terms of satellite based augmentations, the most important systems are the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) - developed at the United States; the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) - developed in Europe; and the Multi-function Satellite-based Augmentation System (MSAS) - developed in Japan. Although EGNOS is not scheduled to be fully operational until 2004, the EGNOS System Test Bed (ESTB), a simplified version of EGNOS available within Europe, began transmitting signals, via an INMARSAT satellite, to potential users in February 2000. Differential systems provide important services to users, but their accuracy advantage, when compared to stand-alone GPS, has decreased significantly due to the discontinuation of Selective Availability (SA), in the 1st of May 2000, which led to an improvement in stand-alone GPS accuracy. Presently, the main benefit of augmentation services is the integrity, which gives users an extra-assurance that the position is correct. Nevertheless, the extra accuracy afforded by differential services (like maritime DGPS and EGNOS) is still extremely important in some maritime applications (such as dredging, hydrographic surveying, buoy positioning, safety of life applications and, particularly, some phases of pilotage waters navigation, including harbour manoeuvres), in some aeronautical applications (namely en-route navigation, landing and air traffic control) and also in land applications (namely positive train control and inland waterways navigation). Therefore, the authors present a comparative study between the accuracy of stand-alone GPS, maritime DGPS and ESTB. The authors evaluate the standard positioning accuracy and discuss the potential benefits gained from the two afore-mentioned augmentation services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 16th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS/GNSS 2003)Same topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207