MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2265805840

Experiences of Emotion Management in Medical Care (Case Study: Toronto)

2013· article· en· W2265805840 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Masoud Kianpour

Notice bibliographique

RevueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEmotional Labor in Professions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPersianWorld Wide WebComputer sciencePsychologyLinguisticsPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction This study lies at the intersection of the sociology of emotions and medical sociology, investigating emotion management among a rather unknown category of medical personnel –Hospital Chaplains. Sociologists of emotions seek to understand how emotions can be socially influenced in terms of both experience and expression. They believe emotions can be influenced by such institutions as culture and religion. As a result, not only do societies and subcultures have different patterns of expressing emotions according to their own norms and characteristics, but there are also different ways of managing emotions in social institutions. For example, in North American healthcare system, hospital chaplaincy is institutionalized, like other members of the medical team, to provide spiritual and religious care, which is often accompanied with emotional support, requiring therefore emotion management. In order to explore emotional experiences that chaplains undergo as a result of working in hospital and dealing with people who are emotionally overwhelmed, the author utilized insights from interactional and symbolic interactionist, phenomenological, and ethnomethodological approaches within the sociology of emotions and spoke with different chaplains from five faith traditions. The aim was to understand how chaplains perform interpersonal emotion management, what techniques, strategies and skills are involved in dealing with people’s emotions, and how performing emotion management in healthcare institutions brings religion and spirituality at the forefront of a secular society. Material and Methods This is a qualitative study based on in-depth interviewing with hospital chaplains working in different hospitals in the Toronto area. Toronto has a large number of hospitals and medical/healthcare institutions, most of which have a spiritual care department in which a number of full-time and part-time chaplains work to provide pastoral and spiritual care for patients, their relatives, and other medical personnel. Approximately 50 chaplains work in different Toronto hospitals, of whom 21 individuals were selected using purpose f ul sampling : a non-random method o f sampling in which the researcher selects “in f ormation-rich” cases f or in-depth interview. The author tried to collect data as records of action-in-process from a variety of people. Because the in-depth responses obtained by qualitative studies cannot be easily categorized, analysis must rely less on counting and correlating and more on interpretation, summary and integration. Therefore, more than anything else, the findings of this study are supported by quotations and case descriptions. The method of data analysis is qualitative description, with a phenomenological inclination: that is, the goal is to describe emotion management experiences as they are lived and felt by chaplains. Discussion of Results & Conclusions Chaplains who participated in this study are between the ages of 33 and 65. The average age is approximately 52. Also, 11 chaplains work part-time and 10 chaplains work full-time. 18 of the 21 chaplains in the sample are women. Recruiting more than 3 male chaplains was not possible due to the fact that hospital chaplaincy is a job predominantly occupied by women. In terms of ethnicity, the majority of the respondents are white, with European and Anglo-Saxon backgrounds. However, the sample also includes two Asian chaplains (with Chinese and Indian backgrounds) and one from the Caribbean Islands. Moreover, the sample includes chaplains from five different religions and faith traditions. The majority of the chaplains are Christian, including five chaplains belonging to the Anglican Church, three to the Roman Catholic Church, two to the United Church of Canada, and one to the Baptist Church. The remaining four Christian chaplains did not specify their Church. Several of the chaplains are church ministers. Also, two chaplains from Buddhism, one from Islam, and one from Judaism are interviewed. Finally, a pagan chaplain, who is a believer in the modern paganism movement and is apparently one of only two such chaplains in Canada, is interviewed. Modern chaplaincy is not about performing religious ritual as much as it is about providing emotional support. The chaplains’ role is to be a compassionate care provider who listens patiently and tries to identify the matrix of emotions in which people are caught. As such, chaplains are supposed to be emotionally present, available and attend to people’s spiritual needs. Like sponges, chaplains soak up people’s emotions, name them and process them so that a healthy release of stress and tension can occur. Therefore, creating effective communication is vital in the work of hospital chaplains. By displaying role distance to their title as “chaplain” and defining themselves as “spiritual care providers,” some chaplains manage to provide a safe social space in which clients feel free to open up and talk. But more importantly, chaplains are equipped with interactional competence, that is, the ability to initiate interaction and direct conversation in ways that patients become motivated to cooperate and talk about their problems. By making a kind of interpersonal emotional bridge, chaplains try to cultivate contextual spirituality. Clues that people give are essential to help chaplains obtain an indexical and contextual understanding of the situation. In other words, the type of spirituality chaplains seek to promote is very much dependent on the context and situation of their clients. As soon as a safe social space is provided, where people feel comfortable to open up and talk, working on contextual spirituality starts, and chaplains begin to explore whatever spiritual, religious or other inner force that is available to patients and can give them power and strength to cope with the situation or come to terms with it. The most important component of this mechanism is identifying and releasing emotions, a process that includes multiple techniques of self, as well as interpersonal, emotion management. References Bolton, S. (2000) “Who Cares? Offering Emotion Work as a ‘Gift’ in the Nursing Labour Process.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32: 580-6. Bolton, S.C., Boyd, C. (2003) “Trolley Dolly or Skilled Emotion Manager? Moving on from Hochschild’s Managed Heart.” Work, Employment and Society, 17(2): 289-308. Cadge, W. (2009) “Religion, Spirituality, and Health: An Institutional Approach. In Clarke, P., B. (Ed.) (2009) The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 836-856. Cadge, W., et al. (2008) “Hospital Chaplaincy in the United States: A National Overview.” Southern Medical Journal, 101(6):626-630. Cicourel, A. (1973) Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction. Penguin Books Ltd. Middlesex: UK. Collins, R. (1981), “On the Micro Foundations of Macrosociology.” American Journal of Sociology, 86 (5): 984-1014. Copp, M. (1998), “When Emotion Work is Doomed to Fail: Ideological and Structural Constraints on Emotion Management.” Symbolic Interaction, 21 (3): 299-328. DeCoster, V. A. (1997) “Physician Treatment of Patient Emotions: An Application of the Sociology of Emotion.” In Erickson R. J., andCuthbertson-Johnson, B. (Eds.) Social Perspectives on Emotion (Vol. 4), NY: JAI Press. 151–78. Denzin, N. (1984) On Understanding Emotion, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Denzin, N. (1985) “Emotion as Lived Experience,” Symbolic Interaction, 8 (2): 223–240. Denzin, N. and Lincoln Y. (Eds.) (2000) The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Second Edition. Newbury Park, CA, Sage. Dey, I. (1993) Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. NY: Routledge. DiLalla, L. F., et al. (2004) “Empathy, Acceptance of Spirituality, and Wellness in Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Study.” Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 16: 165–70. Douglas, J. D., (1985) Creative Interviewing, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Eder, D. and Parker, S. (1987) “The Cultural Production and Reproduction of Gender: The Effect of Extracurricular Activities on Peer Group Culture.” Sociology of Education, 60(3): 200-213. Erickson R. J. and Grove J. C. (2008) “Emotional Labor and Health Care.” Sociology Compass 2 (2): 704-733. Francis E., L. (2006) “Emotions and Health.” In Turner, J. and Stets, J. (Eds.) (2006) Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions. NY: Springer. 591-610. Francis, L, Kathleen M, and Berger, C., (1999). “A Laughing Matter? The Uses of Humor in Medical Interactions.” Motivation and Emotion, 23: 155-174. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine. Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. NY: DoubledayAnchor. Goffman, E. (1961) Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Gordon, S., L. (1981) “The Sociology of Sentiments and Emotions.” In Rosenberg M. and Turner R., H (1981) (Eds.) Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives. New York. Basic Books. 261-278. Halpern, J. (2001) From Detached Concern to Empathy: Humanizing Medical Practice. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press Hochschild, A. (1979) “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology, 85 (3): 551-75. Hochschild, A. (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feelings. Berkeley: University of California Press. Homans, C, G. (1961) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. NY: Harcourt, Brace and World. James, V. and Gabe, J. (2003) Health and the Sociology of Emotions, Oxford: Blackwell. Kenney, J. S. (2010) Canadian Victims of Crime: Critical Insights. Toronto. Canadian Scholars’ Press. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Lively, K. J. (2006) “Emotions in the Workplace.” In Turner, J. and Stets, J. (Eds.) (2006) Handbook of the Sociology of Emotion

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,313
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,995

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,003
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0500,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,223
Tête enseignante GPT0,607
Écart entre enseignants0,383 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Même sujetEmotional Labor in ProfessionsTravaux en français237 207