Experiences of Emotion Management in Medical Care (Case Study: Toronto)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction This study lies at the intersection of the sociology of emotions and medical sociology, investigating emotion management among a rather unknown category of medical personnel –Hospital Chaplains. Sociologists of emotions seek to understand how emotions can be socially influenced in terms of both experience and expression. They believe emotions can be influenced by such institutions as culture and religion. As a result, not only do societies and subcultures have different patterns of expressing emotions according to their own norms and characteristics, but there are also different ways of managing emotions in social institutions. For example, in North American healthcare system, hospital chaplaincy is institutionalized, like other members of the medical team, to provide spiritual and religious care, which is often accompanied with emotional support, requiring therefore emotion management. In order to explore emotional experiences that chaplains undergo as a result of working in hospital and dealing with people who are emotionally overwhelmed, the author utilized insights from interactional and symbolic interactionist, phenomenological, and ethnomethodological approaches within the sociology of emotions and spoke with different chaplains from five faith traditions. The aim was to understand how chaplains perform interpersonal emotion management, what techniques, strategies and skills are involved in dealing with people’s emotions, and how performing emotion management in healthcare institutions brings religion and spirituality at the forefront of a secular society. Material and Methods This is a qualitative study based on in-depth interviewing with hospital chaplains working in different hospitals in the Toronto area. Toronto has a large number of hospitals and medical/healthcare institutions, most of which have a spiritual care department in which a number of full-time and part-time chaplains work to provide pastoral and spiritual care for patients, their relatives, and other medical personnel. Approximately 50 chaplains work in different Toronto hospitals, of whom 21 individuals were selected using purpose f ul sampling : a non-random method o f sampling in which the researcher selects “in f ormation-rich” cases f or in-depth interview. The author tried to collect data as records of action-in-process from a variety of people. Because the in-depth responses obtained by qualitative studies cannot be easily categorized, analysis must rely less on counting and correlating and more on interpretation, summary and integration. Therefore, more than anything else, the findings of this study are supported by quotations and case descriptions. The method of data analysis is qualitative description, with a phenomenological inclination: that is, the goal is to describe emotion management experiences as they are lived and felt by chaplains. Discussion of Results & Conclusions Chaplains who participated in this study are between the ages of 33 and 65. The average age is approximately 52. Also, 11 chaplains work part-time and 10 chaplains work full-time. 18 of the 21 chaplains in the sample are women. Recruiting more than 3 male chaplains was not possible due to the fact that hospital chaplaincy is a job predominantly occupied by women. In terms of ethnicity, the majority of the respondents are white, with European and Anglo-Saxon backgrounds. However, the sample also includes two Asian chaplains (with Chinese and Indian backgrounds) and one from the Caribbean Islands. Moreover, the sample includes chaplains from five different religions and faith traditions. The majority of the chaplains are Christian, including five chaplains belonging to the Anglican Church, three to the Roman Catholic Church, two to the United Church of Canada, and one to the Baptist Church. The remaining four Christian chaplains did not specify their Church. Several of the chaplains are church ministers. Also, two chaplains from Buddhism, one from Islam, and one from Judaism are interviewed. Finally, a pagan chaplain, who is a believer in the modern paganism movement and is apparently one of only two such chaplains in Canada, is interviewed. Modern chaplaincy is not about performing religious ritual as much as it is about providing emotional support. The chaplains’ role is to be a compassionate care provider who listens patiently and tries to identify the matrix of emotions in which people are caught. As such, chaplains are supposed to be emotionally present, available and attend to people’s spiritual needs. Like sponges, chaplains soak up people’s emotions, name them and process them so that a healthy release of stress and tension can occur. Therefore, creating effective communication is vital in the work of hospital chaplains. By displaying role distance to their title as “chaplain” and defining themselves as “spiritual care providers,” some chaplains manage to provide a safe social space in which clients feel free to open up and talk. But more importantly, chaplains are equipped with interactional competence, that is, the ability to initiate interaction and direct conversation in ways that patients become motivated to cooperate and talk about their problems. By making a kind of interpersonal emotional bridge, chaplains try to cultivate contextual spirituality. Clues that people give are essential to help chaplains obtain an indexical and contextual understanding of the situation. In other words, the type of spirituality chaplains seek to promote is very much dependent on the context and situation of their clients. As soon as a safe social space is provided, where people feel comfortable to open up and talk, working on contextual spirituality starts, and chaplains begin to explore whatever spiritual, religious or other inner force that is available to patients and can give them power and strength to cope with the situation or come to terms with it. The most important component of this mechanism is identifying and releasing emotions, a process that includes multiple techniques of self, as well as interpersonal, emotion management. References Bolton, S. (2000) “Who Cares? Offering Emotion Work as a ‘Gift’ in the Nursing Labour Process.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32: 580-6. Bolton, S.C., Boyd, C. (2003) “Trolley Dolly or Skilled Emotion Manager? Moving on from Hochschild’s Managed Heart.” Work, Employment and Society, 17(2): 289-308. Cadge, W. (2009) “Religion, Spirituality, and Health: An Institutional Approach. In Clarke, P., B. (Ed.) (2009) The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 836-856. Cadge, W., et al. (2008) “Hospital Chaplaincy in the United States: A National Overview.” Southern Medical Journal, 101(6):626-630. Cicourel, A. (1973) Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction. Penguin Books Ltd. Middlesex: UK. Collins, R. (1981), “On the Micro Foundations of Macrosociology.” American Journal of Sociology, 86 (5): 984-1014. Copp, M. (1998), “When Emotion Work is Doomed to Fail: Ideological and Structural Constraints on Emotion Management.” Symbolic Interaction, 21 (3): 299-328. DeCoster, V. A. (1997) “Physician Treatment of Patient Emotions: An Application of the Sociology of Emotion.” In Erickson R. J., andCuthbertson-Johnson, B. (Eds.) Social Perspectives on Emotion (Vol. 4), NY: JAI Press. 151–78. Denzin, N. (1984) On Understanding Emotion, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Denzin, N. (1985) “Emotion as Lived Experience,” Symbolic Interaction, 8 (2): 223–240. Denzin, N. and Lincoln Y. (Eds.) (2000) The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Second Edition. Newbury Park, CA, Sage. Dey, I. (1993) Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. NY: Routledge. DiLalla, L. F., et al. (2004) “Empathy, Acceptance of Spirituality, and Wellness in Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Study.” Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 16: 165–70. Douglas, J. D., (1985) Creative Interviewing, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Eder, D. and Parker, S. (1987) “The Cultural Production and Reproduction of Gender: The Effect of Extracurricular Activities on Peer Group Culture.” Sociology of Education, 60(3): 200-213. Erickson R. J. and Grove J. C. (2008) “Emotional Labor and Health Care.” Sociology Compass 2 (2): 704-733. Francis E., L. (2006) “Emotions and Health.” In Turner, J. and Stets, J. (Eds.) (2006) Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions. NY: Springer. 591-610. Francis, L, Kathleen M, and Berger, C., (1999). “A Laughing Matter? The Uses of Humor in Medical Interactions.” Motivation and Emotion, 23: 155-174. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine. Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. NY: DoubledayAnchor. Goffman, E. (1961) Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Gordon, S., L. (1981) “The Sociology of Sentiments and Emotions.” In Rosenberg M. and Turner R., H (1981) (Eds.) Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives. New York. Basic Books. 261-278. Halpern, J. (2001) From Detached Concern to Empathy: Humanizing Medical Practice. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press Hochschild, A. (1979) “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology, 85 (3): 551-75. Hochschild, A. (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feelings. Berkeley: University of California Press. Homans, C, G. (1961) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. NY: Harcourt, Brace and World. James, V. and Gabe, J. (2003) Health and the Sociology of Emotions, Oxford: Blackwell. Kenney, J. S. (2010) Canadian Victims of Crime: Critical Insights. Toronto. Canadian Scholars’ Press. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Lively, K. J. (2006) “Emotions in the Workplace.” In Turner, J. and Stets, J. (Eds.) (2006) Handbook of the Sociology of Emotion
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".