MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2265987962 · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv047

Editorial: The many wonders of the bacterial cell surface

2015· editorial· en· W2265987962 sur OpenAlexaff
Alain Filloux, Chris Whitfield

Notice bibliographique

RevueFEMS Microbiology Reviews · 2015
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesMedical Research Council
Mots-clésBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The microbial world offers constant reminders of the astonishing and exquisite complexity of unicellular life. The bacterial cell envelope is a remarkable example of a multifunctional and multi-faceted structure designed to protect both the integrity of the cell and dictate its shape. It insulates the intracellular compartment from the outside world but still preserves a phenomenal ability to communicate and sense the extracellular environment and exerts control of molecular trafficking of a vast array of nutrients and macromolecules. A virtual issue proposed by FEMS Microbiology Reviews, and entitled ‘Bacterial Cell Surfaces’, provides an exciting flight over the principle features of the composition, flexibility and function of the bacterial cell envelope. Glycerophospholipids represent a basic constituent of all membranes. They form the membrane bilayer that immediately surrounds the bacterial cytoplasmic compartment, as well as the inner leaflet of the Gram-negative outer membrane. While it has long been believed that the membrane composition is relatively fixed, Sohlenkamp and Geiger present a remarkable illustration of the variability of phospholipid content between different species and within a single species faced with the need to adapt to changing environments (Sohlenkamp and Geiger 2015). One of the defining features of bacteria is the application of peptidoglycan (PG) to create the rigid, stress-bearing layer of the cell envelope and dictate cell shape. This is a thick multi-layered structure in Gram-positive bacteria but is predominantly single-layered in Gram-negative bacteria, which have the added protection afforded by the outer membrane. Despite the wide distribution of PG, a few controversial exceptions have remained where this macromolecule could not be identified with conventional methods. Chlamydia-related bacteria provide a classic example. In their review, Jacquier and colleagues report on extraordinary advances that have finally resolved the question of whether Chlamydia-related bacteria contain PG. Not only is PG present, it is also crucial in cell division and for the proper assembly of the septum (Jacquier et al.2015). As mentioned above, Gram-negative bacteria contain a characteristic outer membrane, which is an asymmetric bilayer containing phospholipids at the inner leaflet and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in the outer leaflet and covering ∼75% of the cell surface. The placement of molecules at the surface creates a substantial challenge for bacteria, where the source of activated building blocks is confined to the cytoplasm and cytoplasmic membrane. An extensive literature describes trafficking of outer membrane and extracellular proteins (see below), but the mechanisms underpinning the delivery of phospholipids and LPS have been enigmatic. However, recent research has offered detailed insight into the transport of LPS. The review by Putker and colleagues takes us into a trip across the cell envelope where the structural regions of LPS are synthesized (beginning at the interface of the cytosol and the inner membrane) before being flipped to the periplasm by dedicated transporters. Once assembled a remarkably efficient envelope-spanning molecular machine (the Lpt system) delivers the new molecules to the cell surface (Putker, Bos and Tommassen 2015). The complexity of the structure of LPS is matched by complexity in the assembly pathways. The O-antigen polysaccharide portion of LPS is assembled independently of the lipid A-core domain and the two parts are joined before their entry into the Lpt translocation machine. Kalynych and colleagues provide a historical perspective leading to our current understanding of the molecular details of O-antigen formation (Kalynych et al.2014). Being at the very immediate interface with the external environment, LPS is one of the key molecules detected by the host and serves as a pivotal signaling molecule in a pathogen's interaction with the innate and acquired immune systems. Unlike the more conserved lipid A, the distal O-antigens are hypervariable due to a remarkable range of structural diversity. These molecules have been exploited for valuable serotyping strategies and may provide a significant advantage to the bacterial pathogen, as discussed for Salmonella in our virtual issue (Liu et al.2014). Many bacteria, both Gram-negative and Gram-positive, use capsular polysaccharides to evade host defenses. While these polymers are hypervariable, like O antigens, some have the added advantage of being poorly- or non-immunogenic. This fascinating aspect is described by Cress and colleagues as ‘Masquerading microbial pathogens’ (Cress et al.2014). In many cases bacteria do not live as isolated organisms immediately accessible to the immune system, but instead creates communities called biofilms, which are encased in a matrix containing exopolysaccharides and other molecules that glue the community onto a surface. The role of cell surface macromolecules in establishing the 3D-architecture of biofilms is also reviewed in this virtual issue (Hobley et al.2015). Schematic representation of the cell envelope of gram-positive (left) and gram-negative (right) bacteria. Some elements of the envelope have been labelled. The cytoplasmic membrane (CM) and inner leaflet of the outer membrane (OM) in gram-negative bacterium are made of phospholipids while the outer leaflet of the OM is mainly LPS (core LPS in green). Grey shapes within membranes are mostly integral membrane proteins or lipoproteins. As examples macromolecular complexes have been represented attached to or inserted in the cell envelope such as pili (red in gram-positive) or type III secretion system (needle-like structure in gram-negative). It is also important to recognize that polysaccharides are not the only type of molecules that dominate the bacterial surface. Proteins and glycoproteins can also create structures called S-layers, which cover the cell surface. These possess protective properties but also play roles in virulence and adherence. The functions and mechanisms of assembly/insertion of this family of proteins in bacteria and archaea are superbly described in a review by Sleytr and colleagues and collated within the virtual issue ‘Bacterial Cell Surfaces’ (Sleytr et al.2014). Whereas the S-layer proteins in bacteria are mostly anchored to the PG or attached to LPS, some archaea have lipoprotein S-layers that are anchored through their fatty acyl chains into the lipid bilayer. It has become quite obvious that lipidation of proteins is a widespread strategy to anchor certain classes of membrane proteins. It provides an alternative (but equally important) approach to the standard integral inner membrane proteins with their hydrophobic transmembrane domains, or the outer membrane barrel proteins built of amphipathic beta-strands or alpha-helices. Dedicated machineries can deliver lipoproteins to any location in the cell envelope (i.e. inner membrane, outer membrane inner leaflet or exposed at the cell surface) where they exert a variety of roles including in cell envelope homeostasis. The enzymology of protein lipidation and the export pathway for lipoproteins are comprehensively described in a review by Nienke Buddelmeijer (Buddelmeijer 2015). Bacteria assemble complex cell surface structures to achieve a broad range of basic but essential functions. A variety of fascinating and complex protein-based structures have evolved to meet these requirements. Some bacteria need to attach or move on a surface and can, for example, use type IV pili (Berry and Pelicic 2015). Others exchange genetic material and use conjugative pili and related type IV secretion systems (T4SSs) (Cabezón et al.2015). Some bacteria have lifestyles dependent on the ability to inject effector and toxins into target cells to subvert the host and take advantage during the colonization process and can use the type III secretion system (T3SS) to fulfill such purposes (Diepold and Wagner 2014). In all cases, the proteinaceous structures contain a portion that resembles a filament or a needle that emerges from the cell surface and is made of only few different subunits. However, the molecular platform that facilitates the assembly of the filament/needle is a sophisticated supra-molecular machine inserted in the cell envelope. In the case of Gram-negative bacteria, this machine spans both inner and outer membranes. After decades of progress in experimental tools, particularly X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy, these machines have now been visualized at high resolution. The emerging images illustrate a level of complexity and functional sophistication that we could not have imagined. The molecular details of these trafficking systems, including all the current protein secretion systems (e.g. T1SS to T7SS), have been investigated and revealed in many bacteria, but understanding their counterparts in some other bacteria is still in its infancy. Nevertheless, the massive amount of foundational information now makes possible to browse the genome of a less tractable organism, such as the intracellular bacterium Rickettsia, to identify its secretome – its putative composition in terms of secretion systems and secreted proteins (Gillespie et al.2015). Our understanding of the bacterial cell envelope has been advanced by the impressive development of new experimental methods, particularly those involving imaging and structural biology. However, new and emerging technologies offer the potential to further illuminate bacterial surface composition and dynamics. One critical new approach called metabolic labeling allows researchers to specifically label a cellular component and follow its history in time and space. An overview of the current state-of-the-art in this area is presented in our virtual issue, thanks to the review by Siegrist and colleagues, who discuss the impact this approach had on studies concerning bacterial growth, division and secretion (Siegrist et al.2015). This paper will appear in the FEMS Reviews virtual issue, Bacterial Cell Surfaces, at http://femsre.oxfordjournals.org/content/virtual-issue-bacterial-cell-surfaces.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,026
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,087

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,019
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0050,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,003
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,003
Communication savante0,0070,006
Science ouverte0,0040,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0140,017
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0260,024

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations13
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFEMS Microbiology ReviewsMême sujetProbiotics and Fermented FoodsTravaux en français237 207