MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2265987962 · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv047

Editorial: The many wonders of the bacterial cell surface

2015· editorial· en· W2265987962 on OpenAlexaff
Alain Filloux, Chris Whitfield

Bibliographic record

VenueFEMS Microbiology Reviews · 2015
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The microbial world offers constant reminders of the astonishing and exquisite complexity of unicellular life. The bacterial cell envelope is a remarkable example of a multifunctional and multi-faceted structure designed to protect both the integrity of the cell and dictate its shape. It insulates the intracellular compartment from the outside world but still preserves a phenomenal ability to communicate and sense the extracellular environment and exerts control of molecular trafficking of a vast array of nutrients and macromolecules. A virtual issue proposed by FEMS Microbiology Reviews, and entitled ‘Bacterial Cell Surfaces’, provides an exciting flight over the principle features of the composition, flexibility and function of the bacterial cell envelope. Glycerophospholipids represent a basic constituent of all membranes. They form the membrane bilayer that immediately surrounds the bacterial cytoplasmic compartment, as well as the inner leaflet of the Gram-negative outer membrane. While it has long been believed that the membrane composition is relatively fixed, Sohlenkamp and Geiger present a remarkable illustration of the variability of phospholipid content between different species and within a single species faced with the need to adapt to changing environments (Sohlenkamp and Geiger 2015). One of the defining features of bacteria is the application of peptidoglycan (PG) to create the rigid, stress-bearing layer of the cell envelope and dictate cell shape. This is a thick multi-layered structure in Gram-positive bacteria but is predominantly single-layered in Gram-negative bacteria, which have the added protection afforded by the outer membrane. Despite the wide distribution of PG, a few controversial exceptions have remained where this macromolecule could not be identified with conventional methods. Chlamydia-related bacteria provide a classic example. In their review, Jacquier and colleagues report on extraordinary advances that have finally resolved the question of whether Chlamydia-related bacteria contain PG. Not only is PG present, it is also … [↵][1]* Corresponding editors. E-mail: a.filloux{at}imperial.ac.uk and cwhitfie{at}uoguelph.ca [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEMS Microbiology ReviewsSame topicProbiotics and Fermented FoodsFrench-language works237,207