Book Reviews: Flows, Rhythms, and Intensities of Early Childhood Education Curriculum, Rethinking Play and Pedagogy in Early Childhood Education: Concepts, Contexts and Cultures, Wellbeing from Birth, towards Excellence in Early Years Education: Exploring Narratives of Experience
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Over the past decade, an unprecedented number of Canadian provinces have developed early learning curriculum frameworks.As the editor of this volume of essays, Veronica Pacini-Ketchabaw notes that the early childhood curriculum in some parts of Canada has 'moved away from long-debated guidelines such as developmentally appropriate practice' (p.xiv) to frameworks which articulate visions, beliefs, values and principles related to early learning and pedagogy.The essays emerged out of lecturers, Master's and doctoral students, early childhood educators and teacher educators working with British Columbia's Early Learning Framework (Government of British Columbia, 2008), which was influenced by New Zealand's early childhood curriculum and Reggio Emilia's image of the powerful, competent child.Nevertheless, educators working with different curriculum frameworks will find in this book a range of essays that will help to keep all frameworks open to critical examination and discussion.In her introduction, Pacini-Ketchabaw writes that for several years the authors collaborated and explored different perspectives and theoretical standpoints on the early childhood curriculum; the stories and examples in the essays nicely capture the rich and dense conversations that the authors must have had.Upper-level undergraduate and graduate students in early childhood studies programmes will find the book engaging and could continue and enrich these conversations.The early childhood curriculum issues -teacher-child relationships, routines and transitions, and family partnerships -that the essays examine will not be new to readers.It is the authors' indepth use of feminist and post-foundational theories to question their past and future curriculum practices, particularly in relation to curriculum frameworks, that brings a fresh perspective to conceptualisations of early childhood curriculum.Drawing on Deleuze and Guattari's (1987) 'possibilities for other worlds', the volume is organised into three strands or sections -flows, rhythms and intensities -which Pacini-Ketchabaw uniquely describes as 'residing in curriculum's creative and productive practices' (p.xv).The premise of the book is that while the three strands 'run through early childhood curriculum' (p.xi), they remain hidden without examination.Have the authors been able to illuminate the complex nature of the strands using post-foundational theoretical tools?Working my way through each essay, all with thick descriptions of theory, concepts and practices, I was persuaded that the book offers opportunities to bring early childhood practice to 'other spaces of curriculum thought' (p.xiii).The first strand of essays, by Enid Elliot, Cristina D. Vintimilla and Kirsten Ho Chan, follows the rhizomes of the teacher and child in curriculum-making to find 'broken directions' and 'to conjugate deterritorialized flows' (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987, p. 11).Using Bakhtin's (1981) concepts of dialogue and responsibility, Elliot makes an interesting argument that while a curriculum framework can articulate the importance of developing relationships with children, it cannot, as a monologue document, 'stimulate our curricula imaginations'.Rather, Elliot says, we need dialogues and interactions with children, out of which curriculum flows (p.14).Drawing on Austin's (1962) and Butler's (1997) concepts of performativity, Vintimilla examines images of teaching in student teacher assignments, which hung on classroom walls like 'ventriloquists'.Vintimilla writes rather poignantly about how the images presented and represented themselves 'as repetitions' every time the students and teacher educators entered and left the classroom (p.29).Vintimilla contends that students need to be introduced to better theoretical tools from educational
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,009 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».