MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2269079687 · doi:10.2304/ciec.2012.13.3.256

Book Reviews: Flows, Rhythms, and Intensities of Early Childhood Education Curriculum, Rethinking Play and Pedagogy in Early Childhood Education: Concepts, Contexts and Cultures, Wellbeing from Birth, towards Excellence in Early Years Education: Exploring Narratives of Experience

2012· article· en· W2269079687 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel Langford, D. L. Watson, Sarah Cousins, Joy Chalke

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Issues in Early Childhood · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Feminism, and Media
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReflexivityExcellenceEarly childhood educationPedagogyEarly childhoodContext (archaeology)CurriculumSociologyInterpretation (philosophy)Teacher educationPsychologySocial scienceEpistemologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past decade, an unprecedented number of Canadian provinces have developed early learning curriculum frameworks.As the editor of this volume of essays, Veronica Pacini-Ketchabaw notes that the early childhood curriculum in some parts of Canada has 'moved away from long-debated guidelines such as developmentally appropriate practice' (p.xiv) to frameworks which articulate visions, beliefs, values and principles related to early learning and pedagogy.The essays emerged out of lecturers, Master's and doctoral students, early childhood educators and teacher educators working with British Columbia's Early Learning Framework (Government of British Columbia, 2008), which was influenced by New Zealand's early childhood curriculum and Reggio Emilia's image of the powerful, competent child.Nevertheless, educators working with different curriculum frameworks will find in this book a range of essays that will help to keep all frameworks open to critical examination and discussion.In her introduction, Pacini-Ketchabaw writes that for several years the authors collaborated and explored different perspectives and theoretical standpoints on the early childhood curriculum; the stories and examples in the essays nicely capture the rich and dense conversations that the authors must have had.Upper-level undergraduate and graduate students in early childhood studies programmes will find the book engaging and could continue and enrich these conversations.The early childhood curriculum issues -teacher-child relationships, routines and transitions, and family partnerships -that the essays examine will not be new to readers.It is the authors' indepth use of feminist and post-foundational theories to question their past and future curriculum practices, particularly in relation to curriculum frameworks, that brings a fresh perspective to conceptualisations of early childhood curriculum.Drawing on Deleuze and Guattari's (1987) 'possibilities for other worlds', the volume is organised into three strands or sections -flows, rhythms and intensities -which Pacini-Ketchabaw uniquely describes as 'residing in curriculum's creative and productive practices' (p.xv).The premise of the book is that while the three strands 'run through early childhood curriculum' (p.xi), they remain hidden without examination.Have the authors been able to illuminate the complex nature of the strands using post-foundational theoretical tools?Working my way through each essay, all with thick descriptions of theory, concepts and practices, I was persuaded that the book offers opportunities to bring early childhood practice to 'other spaces of curriculum thought' (p.xiii).The first strand of essays, by Enid Elliot, Cristina D. Vintimilla and Kirsten Ho Chan, follows the rhizomes of the teacher and child in curriculum-making to find 'broken directions' and 'to conjugate deterritorialized flows' (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987, p. 11).Using Bakhtin's (1981) concepts of dialogue and responsibility, Elliot makes an interesting argument that while a curriculum framework can articulate the importance of developing relationships with children, it cannot, as a monologue document, 'stimulate our curricula imaginations'.Rather, Elliot says, we need dialogues and interactions with children, out of which curriculum flows (p.14).Drawing on Austin's (1962) and Butler's (1997) concepts of performativity, Vintimilla examines images of teaching in student teacher assignments, which hung on classroom walls like 'ventriloquists'.Vintimilla writes rather poignantly about how the images presented and represented themselves 'as repetitions' every time the students and teacher educators entered and left the classroom (p.29).Vintimilla contends that students need to be introduced to better theoretical tools from educational

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContemporary Issues in Early ChildhoodSame topicGender, Feminism, and MediaFrench-language works237,207