Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Shoah in Ukraine: History, Testimony, Memorialization Yves Laberge The Shoah in Ukraine: History, Testimony, Memorialization. Edited by Ray Brandon and Wendy Lower. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010. Pp. ix + 378. Paper $35.00. ISBN 978-0253222688. The Shoah in Ukraine looks at how the extermination of the Jews in Ukraine is retold, understood, and commemorated. The contributors demonstrate that more than one million Ukrainians of Jewish descent were, in fact, the victims of antisemitic acts committed by many non-Jewish Ukrainians themselves, especially between 1941 and 1944. Ghettoization, deportation, and the mass murder of 1.2 million Jews by ethnic Ukrainians occurred in brutal and arbitrary ways beginning in 1941. Reflecting on the concept of victimization, Ray Brandon and Wendy Lower conclude their Introduction [End Page 207] with an observation that nicely summarizes the findings of the entire volume: “The perception of Ukraine’s ethnic Germans as ‘double victims’ of history—first as victims of Soviet rule before the war, then as targets of anti-German acts of revenge toward war’s end—has generally overshadowed the role they played in implementing Nazi killing policies” (11). Emphasizing the numerous links with Austria, especially in the nineteenth century, the editors argue that many Ukrainians would have felt highly receptive toward propaganda from German-speaking countries in the 1940s. Brandon and Lower open the volume by presenting this lesser-known story of the Holocaust, and argue that because of the general focus on Auschwitz, Treblinka, and Dachau, many events that occurred in the Ukraine have remained unknown, even to many Ukrainians. In this vein, many of the contributors investigate how historians have remembered (or forgotten) the tragic events that took place there. Omer Bartov’s chapter, for example, analyzes the ongoing cult of figures like Stepan Bandera, a Ukrainian nationalist who “was responsible for the death of thousands of Jews during the pogroms in western Ukraine in 1941” (142). A recent photograph included in the volume shows a monument and a public park in the city of Drohobych that still bear Bandera’s name today. Even though many thousands of Jews were killed each month between 1941 and 1944 in the city of Ternopil, there is still little public mention of the mass murder that took place there. In his chapter about the relationships between Jews and non-Jews in Galicia, Frank Golczewski helps to overcome this memory gap by using the testimonies of survivors as well as various types of propaganda, such as a Ukrainian recruitment poster that invited patriots to join the SS Volunteer Rifle Division—which subtly linked the artificial famine of 1932–1933 (Holodomor) to the “Judeo-Bolshevik monster” (142). This book is groundbreaking, but as the co-editors admit in their Introduction, “a comprehensive history of the Holocaust in the Ukraine as a whole still has not been written” (3). This reflects, in part, the great challenges involved in writing the history of the Holocaust there. Because the Ukraine’s borders changed dramatically over several decades, historians are required to conduct research in many languages, including Ukrainian, Russian, German, and Polish. In addition, the archives for some Ukrainian cities are now located in neighbouring countries. Thanks to its rich documentation and clearly written, nuanced contributions, The Shoah in Ukraine is an innovative and interdisciplinary contribution that serves as an essential step in that direction by drawing on history, memory studies, and political science. [End Page 208] Yves Laberge Université Laval Copyright © 2012 German Studies Association
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle