MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2271093656 · doi:10.1353/gsr.2012.a465700

The Shoah in Ukraine: History, Testimony, Memorialization (review)

2012· article· en· W2271093656 sur OpenAlex
Yves Laberge

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueGerman Studies Review · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEastern European Communism and Reforms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMemorializationThe HolocaustNazismDeportationHistoryJudaismGermanGenocideAntisemitismPersecutionClassicsNazi concentration campsLawPoliticsPolitical scienceImmigrationArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Shoah in Ukraine: History, Testimony, Memorialization Yves Laberge The Shoah in Ukraine: History, Testimony, Memorialization. Edited by Ray Brandon and Wendy Lower. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010. Pp. ix + 378. Paper $35.00. ISBN 978-0253222688. The Shoah in Ukraine looks at how the extermination of the Jews in Ukraine is retold, understood, and commemorated. The contributors demonstrate that more than one million Ukrainians of Jewish descent were, in fact, the victims of antisemitic acts committed by many non-Jewish Ukrainians themselves, especially between 1941 and 1944. Ghettoization, deportation, and the mass murder of 1.2 million Jews by ethnic Ukrainians occurred in brutal and arbitrary ways beginning in 1941. Reflecting on the concept of victimization, Ray Brandon and Wendy Lower conclude their Introduction [End Page 207] with an observation that nicely summarizes the findings of the entire volume: “The perception of Ukraine’s ethnic Germans as ‘double victims’ of history—first as victims of Soviet rule before the war, then as targets of anti-German acts of revenge toward war’s end—has generally overshadowed the role they played in implementing Nazi killing policies” (11). Emphasizing the numerous links with Austria, especially in the nineteenth century, the editors argue that many Ukrainians would have felt highly receptive toward propaganda from German-speaking countries in the 1940s. Brandon and Lower open the volume by presenting this lesser-known story of the Holocaust, and argue that because of the general focus on Auschwitz, Treblinka, and Dachau, many events that occurred in the Ukraine have remained unknown, even to many Ukrainians. In this vein, many of the contributors investigate how historians have remembered (or forgotten) the tragic events that took place there. Omer Bartov’s chapter, for example, analyzes the ongoing cult of figures like Stepan Bandera, a Ukrainian nationalist who “was responsible for the death of thousands of Jews during the pogroms in western Ukraine in 1941” (142). A recent photograph included in the volume shows a monument and a public park in the city of Drohobych that still bear Bandera’s name today. Even though many thousands of Jews were killed each month between 1941 and 1944 in the city of Ternopil, there is still little public mention of the mass murder that took place there. In his chapter about the relationships between Jews and non-Jews in Galicia, Frank Golczewski helps to overcome this memory gap by using the testimonies of survivors as well as various types of propaganda, such as a Ukrainian recruitment poster that invited patriots to join the SS Volunteer Rifle Division—which subtly linked the artificial famine of 1932–1933 (Holodomor) to the “Judeo-Bolshevik monster” (142). This book is groundbreaking, but as the co-editors admit in their Introduction, “a comprehensive history of the Holocaust in the Ukraine as a whole still has not been written” (3). This reflects, in part, the great challenges involved in writing the history of the Holocaust there. Because the Ukraine’s borders changed dramatically over several decades, historians are required to conduct research in many languages, including Ukrainian, Russian, German, and Polish. In addition, the archives for some Ukrainian cities are now located in neighbouring countries. Thanks to its rich documentation and clearly written, nuanced contributions, The Shoah in Ukraine is an innovative and interdisciplinary contribution that serves as an essential step in that direction by drawing on history, memory studies, and political science. [End Page 208] Yves Laberge Université Laval Copyright © 2012 German Studies Association

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,292
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,384

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,112
Tête enseignante GPT0,413
Écart entre enseignants0,301 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle