Notice bibliographique
Résumé
AbstractOver the 120-year life of the cathedral there has been gradual deterioration of the building fabric and structure, including damage caused by the 1968 Meckering earthquake. Starting in 2002, with no original drawings and little recorded history, Maitland Consulting Structural Engineering undertook a comprehensive process of a building condition audit, data review, information gathering, material testing, structural analysis and design, remediation documentation, and contract administration during construction. The project was completed in September 2007 at a total cost of $5.4 million, of which $2.0 million was for structural enhancement. Numerous defects evident from physical inspection and analysis required consideration of many alternative solutions and lateral thinking in order to meet the client’s objectives. None of the work undertaken was mandatory. It occurred because of the vision of the Church and commitment of its project team to ensure the building survived into the future with minimal damage and degradation, and is a safe place for all to enter.Keywords: Strengthening of heritage building for earthquakeMinimum visual intrusion of remedial works Additional informationNotes on contributorsI.B.G. MaitlandIan BG Maitland (FIEAust, CPEng) graduated with honours degree in civil engineering from University of Adelaide in 1962. He spent his early professional career in Adelaide, Melbourne, Montreal and London. From 1970 to 1990, he was the manager/managing director of the Western Australian office of a large multidiscipline national consulting company.Ian has been in private practice since 1990, trading as Maitland Consulting Structural Engineering (MCSE). He specialises in structural engineering for heritage projects, and investigation of structural failures and building problems generally. Heritage work now constitutes the majority of MCSE’s activities. Apart from St George’s Cathedral, significant projects include Raine Square Redevelopment Perth, Point Cloates Lighthouse, E Shed relocation Fremantle, numerous churches and town halls, and many structures on Rottnest Island. Clients include Heritage Council of Western Australia, National Trust of Australia, and many state and local government authorities, heritage organisations, heritage architects and owners of heritage listed properties.Ian has been a member of the Rottnest Island Cultural Heritage Advisory Committee since 2003, and was a Board Member of WA State Supply Commission from 1998 to 2002. He is also a member of Engineers Australia’s Heritage Panel in Western Australia.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».