Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractOver the 120-year life of the cathedral there has been gradual deterioration of the building fabric and structure, including damage caused by the 1968 Meckering earthquake. Starting in 2002, with no original drawings and little recorded history, Maitland Consulting Structural Engineering undertook a comprehensive process of a building condition audit, data review, information gathering, material testing, structural analysis and design, remediation documentation, and contract administration during construction. The project was completed in September 2007 at a total cost of $5.4 million, of which $2.0 million was for structural enhancement. Numerous defects evident from physical inspection and analysis required consideration of many alternative solutions and lateral thinking in order to meet the client’s objectives. None of the work undertaken was mandatory. It occurred because of the vision of the Church and commitment of its project team to ensure the building survived into the future with minimal damage and degradation, and is a safe place for all to enter.Keywords: Strengthening of heritage building for earthquakeMinimum visual intrusion of remedial works Additional informationNotes on contributorsI.B.G. MaitlandIan BG Maitland (FIEAust, CPEng) graduated with honours degree in civil engineering from University of Adelaide in 1962. He spent his early professional career in Adelaide, Melbourne, Montreal and London. From 1970 to 1990, he was the manager/managing director of the Western Australian office of a large multidiscipline national consulting company.Ian has been in private practice since 1990, trading as Maitland Consulting Structural Engineering (MCSE). He specialises in structural engineering for heritage projects, and investigation of structural failures and building problems generally. Heritage work now constitutes the majority of MCSE’s activities. Apart from St George’s Cathedral, significant projects include Raine Square Redevelopment Perth, Point Cloates Lighthouse, E Shed relocation Fremantle, numerous churches and town halls, and many structures on Rottnest Island. Clients include Heritage Council of Western Australia, National Trust of Australia, and many state and local government authorities, heritage organisations, heritage architects and owners of heritage listed properties.Ian has been a member of the Rottnest Island Cultural Heritage Advisory Committee since 2003, and was a Board Member of WA State Supply Commission from 1998 to 2002. He is also a member of Engineers Australia’s Heritage Panel in Western Australia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".