Reconstructing the <i>Palladium of British America</i>: How the Rebellion of 1837 and Charles Fothergill Helped to Establish Susanna Moodie as a Writer in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I. Toward a Literary ConnectionThe study of authorship, literary culture, and publishing conditions in Upper Canada is illuminated by the brief convergence of two English-born writers, Susanna Moodie (I803-I885) and Charles Fothergill (I782-I840), from late December 1837 until the summer of 1839.The convergence, which is to be found on the pages of Fothergill's newspaper, The PallaEdium ofBritish America and Upper Canada Mercantile Advertiser, tells us several things about the profession of writing, the challenge of finding suitable outlets for one's work, and the kinds of public communication available in that time.In the process we encounter the story of Fothergill's deepening struggles and his final failure in Upper Canada even as we gain a clearer view of John and Susanna Moodie, a displaced British literary couple diligently pursuing whatever opportunities for publication they could find from their home in the remlote "bush."A Suffolk-born woman who had written extensively for London magazines and annuals in her twenties, Susanna Moodie had emigrated to Upper Canada in I832 with her husband and one-year Papers of the Bibliographical Society of Canada 40/I on zo December I837, just two weeks after the outbreak, at a time when feelings about the Rebellion were running very high.Anxieties about the whereabouts of the perpetrators, uncertainties about continuing local threats, and the renewed fear of American invasion abounded.WVhen M\~oodie's "An Address to the Freemen of Canada" appeared in that first Padlladiumn issue, it found a ready audience in Toronto and Upper Canada, especially among those who were proud of their British birth.The story of Susanna Moodie's emergence as a prominent writer in Canada is told in her autobiographical recollection, Roughing It in the Bush (I892).3The general accuracy of her account can be verified and has seldom been questioned.However, a close examination of available documents reveals a more complex set of circumstances and actions than she describes there.Most notably, she neglected to include the crucial initiatory role played by the Palladium and, in particular, its owner and "co-editor."The elderly Fothergill, a man of middle-class Yorkshire and Quaker roots, had been in Canada since 18I6 and had made a considerable reputation for himself as a naturalist, writer, editor, politician, public figure, and community builder.4The enthusiastic and empathetic interest he took in Moodie's poetry, especially her patriotic verse, paved the way for her profitable and extended connection with John Lovell and his Montreal-based magazine, The Literary Garland.sIt is likely that Fothergill, who was struggling with very serious financial difficulties during the year and a half of his editorship, did not pay her for her contributions.For that reason, or perhaps simply because of lapse of memory, she neglected to mention the part he played in her literary emergence."These two personal narratives converge in the pages of the Padlla~dium and together provide valuable clues to the operations of 3See the chapter entitled "The Outbreak" in Roughing It in the Bush, ed.Carl Balistadt (Ottawa: Carieton UP, 1988), 430-r2.4 Paul Romney describes Fothergill in the Dictionary of Canadian Biography (DCB) VII: 3I7, as followrs: "naturalist,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,050 | 0,028 |
| Communication savante | 0,017 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».