Reconstructing the <i>Palladium of British America</i>: How the Rebellion of 1837 and Charles Fothergill Helped to Establish Susanna Moodie as a Writer in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I. Toward a Literary ConnectionThe study of authorship, literary culture, and publishing conditions in Upper Canada is illuminated by the brief convergence of two English-born writers, Susanna Moodie (I803-I885) and Charles Fothergill (I782-I840), from late December 1837 until the summer of 1839.The convergence, which is to be found on the pages of Fothergill's newspaper, The PallaEdium ofBritish America and Upper Canada Mercantile Advertiser, tells us several things about the profession of writing, the challenge of finding suitable outlets for one's work, and the kinds of public communication available in that time.In the process we encounter the story of Fothergill's deepening struggles and his final failure in Upper Canada even as we gain a clearer view of John and Susanna Moodie, a displaced British literary couple diligently pursuing whatever opportunities for publication they could find from their home in the remlote "bush."A Suffolk-born woman who had written extensively for London magazines and annuals in her twenties, Susanna Moodie had emigrated to Upper Canada in I832 with her husband and one-year Papers of the Bibliographical Society of Canada 40/I on zo December I837, just two weeks after the outbreak, at a time when feelings about the Rebellion were running very high.Anxieties about the whereabouts of the perpetrators, uncertainties about continuing local threats, and the renewed fear of American invasion abounded.WVhen M\~oodie's "An Address to the Freemen of Canada" appeared in that first Padlladiumn issue, it found a ready audience in Toronto and Upper Canada, especially among those who were proud of their British birth.The story of Susanna Moodie's emergence as a prominent writer in Canada is told in her autobiographical recollection, Roughing It in the Bush (I892).3The general accuracy of her account can be verified and has seldom been questioned.However, a close examination of available documents reveals a more complex set of circumstances and actions than she describes there.Most notably, she neglected to include the crucial initiatory role played by the Palladium and, in particular, its owner and "co-editor."The elderly Fothergill, a man of middle-class Yorkshire and Quaker roots, had been in Canada since 18I6 and had made a considerable reputation for himself as a naturalist, writer, editor, politician, public figure, and community builder.4The enthusiastic and empathetic interest he took in Moodie's poetry, especially her patriotic verse, paved the way for her profitable and extended connection with John Lovell and his Montreal-based magazine, The Literary Garland.sIt is likely that Fothergill, who was struggling with very serious financial difficulties during the year and a half of his editorship, did not pay her for her contributions.For that reason, or perhaps simply because of lapse of memory, she neglected to mention the part he played in her literary emergence."These two personal narratives converge in the pages of the Padlla~dium and together provide valuable clues to the operations of 3See the chapter entitled "The Outbreak" in Roughing It in the Bush, ed.Carl Balistadt (Ottawa: Carieton UP, 1988), 430-r2.4 Paul Romney describes Fothergill in the Dictionary of Canadian Biography (DCB) VII: 3I7, as followrs: "naturalist,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.050 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".