[The Second Greatest Disappointment: Honeymooning & Tourism at Niagara Falls]
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Karen Dubinsky's The Second Greatest Disappointment is feminist history at its most fun. It brings a fresh and yet substantive account of the politics of heterosexuality to bear on one of its most cherished institutions: the honeymoon. Along the way, it questions received accounts of the falls, tourism, the wedding, the politics of race, class and sexual orientation and leaves on stone unturned. Simultaneously cultural studies, popular history and political economy, this book brings something new to each of its areas of concern. Because the method here is interdisplinary and holistic, this book is a satisfying historical romp.Characterizing Niagara Falls as a theme park for heterosexuality, Dubinsky turns her eye on the increasing disciplinary knowledge unleashed on the practices of the over the last century. With its roots in the wedding of the British ruling class of the nineteenth century, the was originally a way for the new couple to meet far- flung family members unable to attend the wedding. In this sense, its roots were not explicitly sexual, but rather a way to cement family ties. At the end of the nineteenth century, then, the tour was the exclusive preserve of the privileged and the wealthy. However as the century matured, it became do rigueur for middle and working class couples to travel to exotic locations after the wedding. And in the wake of psychoanalysis, with the erotic as the presumed core of the emerging modern individual, sexual compatibility became an important ingredient in married life for the first time. The increasing availability of mass transportation as well as these changing social and sexual mores meant that honeymoon became a sly reference to the unspeakable: sex, and lots of it.Thus, throughout its transformations, the attracted experts whose task it was to distinguish between normalcy and deviancy. Doctors, psychiatrists, counsellors and other marriage experts turned their gaze on the practices of honeymooning in an effort to regulate, discipline and control married sex. As these experts pointed out, many possible dangers lurked inside the presumed ignorance of the newly wed -- such conditions as shock, impotence, exhaustion and hysteria -- and these opening night disasters could lead to marital disharmony. Happy honeymoons were more than simply devices to begin married life; the fate of the family, and indeed the nation, was at stake. In this sense then, the case presented in this book shows in fascinating detail the ways that the ideologies of gender and of the presumed naturalness of married heterosex are thoroughly worked up through strategies of governance that pinpoint what appears to be the deepest most natural thing in the world. As the story Dubinsky tells unfolds, the point that sexuality, like gender, is learned, acquired, ritualized and performed finds a compelling new case study (p. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».