MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W227593939

[The Second Greatest Disappointment: Honeymooning & Tourism at Niagara Falls]

2001· article· en· W227593939 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Karen Dubinsky, Catherine Kellogg

Bibliographic record

VenueResources for feminist research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisappointmentPoliticsSociologyGender studiesHistoryLawPolitical sciencePsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Karen Dubinsky's The Second Greatest Disappointment is feminist history at its most fun. It brings a fresh and yet substantive account of the politics of heterosexuality to bear on one of its most cherished institutions: the honeymoon. Along the way, it questions received accounts of the falls, tourism, the wedding, the politics of race, class and sexual orientation and leaves on stone unturned. Simultaneously cultural studies, popular history and political economy, this book brings something new to each of its areas of concern. Because the method here is interdisplinary and holistic, this book is a satisfying historical romp.Characterizing Niagara Falls as a theme park for heterosexuality, Dubinsky turns her eye on the increasing disciplinary knowledge unleashed on the practices of the over the last century. With its roots in the wedding of the British ruling class of the nineteenth century, the was originally a way for the new couple to meet far- flung family members unable to attend the wedding. In this sense, its roots were not explicitly sexual, but rather a way to cement family ties. At the end of the nineteenth century, then, the tour was the exclusive preserve of the privileged and the wealthy. However as the century matured, it became do rigueur for middle and working class couples to travel to exotic locations after the wedding. And in the wake of psychoanalysis, with the erotic as the presumed core of the emerging modern individual, sexual compatibility became an important ingredient in married life for the first time. The increasing availability of mass transportation as well as these changing social and sexual mores meant that honeymoon became a sly reference to the unspeakable: sex, and lots of it.Thus, throughout its transformations, the attracted experts whose task it was to distinguish between normalcy and deviancy. Doctors, psychiatrists, counsellors and other marriage experts turned their gaze on the practices of honeymooning in an effort to regulate, discipline and control married sex. As these experts pointed out, many possible dangers lurked inside the presumed ignorance of the newly wed -- such conditions as shock, impotence, exhaustion and hysteria -- and these opening night disasters could lead to marital disharmony. Happy honeymoons were more than simply devices to begin married life; the fate of the family, and indeed the nation, was at stake. In this sense then, the case presented in this book shows in fascinating detail the ways that the ideologies of gender and of the presumed naturalness of married heterosex are thoroughly worked up through strategies of governance that pinpoint what appears to be the deepest most natural thing in the world. As the story Dubinsky tells unfolds, the point that sexuality, like gender, is learned, acquired, ritualized and performed finds a compelling new case study (p. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResources for feminist researchSame topicTravel Writing and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207