MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2275966295 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.314.314

Selective Photodepletion of Recipient-Alloreactive T-Cells Enables Safe and Efficacious Haploidentical HSCT: Initial Results from a Phase 2 Trial in Patients with AML, ALL, and MDS

2014· article· en· W2275966295 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Denis‐Claude Roy, Johan Maertens, Irwin Walker, Silvy Lachance, Jean Roy, S.R. Foley, Philippe Lewalle, Dominik Selleslag, Liesbeth de Jong, J. Velthuis, Lisya Gerez, K Reitsma, Edwin Wagena, Stephan Mielke

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Établissements canadiensJuravinski HospitalUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHematopoietic stem cell transplantationGraft-versus-host diseaseImmunologyLeukemiaInternal medicineCD34Clinical trialPhases of clinical researchStem cellTransplantationOncologyGastroenterologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction For patients in need of a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) but lacking an HLA matched donor, a haploidentical family donor is a particularly appealing alternative. However, to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), haploidentical HSCT necessitates intensive in vivo or ex vivo T-cell depletion that results in frequent and often lethal infectious complications and/or high relapse rates, thus decreasing overall survival. To overcome this limitation, we have developed a strategy that photodepletes host-reactive cells from the donor T cell graft, while preserving anti-infection and anti-leukemia reactivity. Patients and Methods In an open-label, multi-center phase 2 clinical trial (CR-AIR-007; NCT01794299), 12 of a planned 23 patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies were treated to date with this immunotherapy approach consisting of donor lymphocytes selectively allodepleted of host-reactive T-cells using photodynamic therapy (ATIR). ATIR was infused 28-32 days after haploidentical CD34-selected HSCT. No post-transplant GVHD prophylaxis was used. These patients were compared to a control group of 28 patients treated in a previous Phase 2 study with an investigational product manufactured using a process different from the Phase 1 trial and resulting mainly in dead and inactive cells instead of ATIR (CR-AIR-004). Results Twelve patients, mean age of 45 (range 21-64), 6 females/6 males with AML (n=9) and ALL (n=3) were treated with ATIR so far. ATIR consisted mainly of T-cells (>90%), with residual B and NK cells (≤10%). Selective depletion of recipient-reactivity in each ATIR cell graft was assessed using a CFSE-based proliferation assay. Cell division numbers upon stimulation were analyzed using Modfit LT software (Fig 1A), which generated a proliferation index representing viable/reactive T-cells in donor cells (blue) and final ATIR product (green)(Fig 1B). Selective depletion of recipient-reactive T-cells with preservation of reactivity towards 3rd party antigens and anti-CD3/CD28 was observed in all ATIR cell grafts and used as a release criteria in the 007 study. Figure 1: A) CFSE-dilution pattern in Modfit LT software of ATIR stimulated with 3rd party cells. B) CFSE-based proliferation confirmed selective depletion of recipient-reactive T-cells in all grafts (representative depiction). Figure 1:. A) CFSE-dilution pattern in Modfit LT software of ATIR stimulated with 3rd party cells. B) CFSE-based proliferation confirmed selective depletion of recipient-reactive T-cells in all grafts (representative depiction). Preparative regimen consisted of A) FTBI (1200 cGy; n=5) or B) melphalan (120 mg/m2; n=7), along with thiotepa (10 mg/kg), fludarabine (30 mg/m2 x5 d) and ATG (2.5 mg/kg x4 d). Neutrophil and platelet engraftment was achieved in all patients at a median of 12 days (range: 9-35). No patient experienced graft rejection. Patients (n=28) in the 004 control group, mean age of 42 (range 18-61), 13 females/15 males had AML (n=19), ALL (n=6) or MDS (n=3). CFSE proliferation in T-cell grafts could not be assessed a posteriori due to low cell viability. These 004 patients received the same A) FTBI- (n=14), B) melphalan- (n= 10) based preparative regimen as 007 patients, except for 4 patients receiving single fraction (800 cGy) TBI. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment was achieved at a median of 16 days (range: 7-54). Three patients showed secondary graft rejection. Two patients in study CR-AIR-007 developed acute GVHD grade I (skin only) approximately 130 days post HSCT, which was of short duration, (18 and 41 days). Two patients died of infection and no patient relapsed at a mean follow-up of 8 months post HSCT (range 1-14 months). In the CR-AIR-004 control group, 2 patients developed grade I, 1 patient grade II and 3 patients grade III GvHD, none of these cases were lethal. Seventeen patients died of transplant related complications and 2 patients of relapse/disease progression. TRM is 20% in 007 group vs 63% in the 004 control group and OS is 80% in 007 group vs 35% in the 004 control group at 9 months post-transplant (Figures 2A and 2B). Figure 2A Kaplan Meier Transplant Related Mortality: 004 vs 007 (p=0.06) Figure 2B Kaplan Meier Overall Survival (OS): 004 vs 007 (p=0.03) Conclusions These data confirm that a novel immunotherapy strategy consisting of donor lymphocytes selectively photodepleted of alloreactive cells (ATIR) can be manufactured consistently and reproducibly. Results to date show that ATIR is safe and does not cause any grade III/IV GvHD. Moreover, haploidentical HSCT patients treated with ATIR demonstrate very promising TRM and OS rates when compared to the control group. Disclosures Roy: Kiadis Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Foley:Hoffman-LaRoche: Advisory Board/Lectures Other, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Advisory Board/Lectures, Advisory Board/Lectures Other, Honoraria; Sanofi: Advisory Board/Lectures, Advisory Board/Lectures Other, Honoraria; Celgene: Advisory Board/Lectures, Advisory Board/Lectures Other, Honoraria; Pfizer: Advisory Board/Lectures Other, Honoraria; Novartis: Advisory Board/Lectures Other, Honoraria; Jansen: Advisory Board/Lectures Other, Honoraria; Alexion: Advisory Board/Lectures, Advisory Board/Lectures Other, Honoraria; Roche Canada: Honoraria, Research Funding, Unrestricted educational grant, Unrestricted educational grant Other. De Jong:Kiadis Pharma: Employment. Velthuis:Kiadis Pharma: Employment. Gerez:Kiadis Pharma: Employment. Reitsma:Kiadis Pharma: Employment. Wagena:Kiadis Pharma: Employment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2014
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTravaux en français237 207