A Long-Life 3-Stack 12 V Dry Polymer Battery Using LiNi<sub>1/3</sub>Mn<sub>1/3</sub>Co<sub>1/3</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and Graphite
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Safety is more important than high energy in stationary batteries. In addition, material choices based on the low-cost and easy production of larger batteries is another critical issue for developing large energy storage systems comparable to pumped hydro systems. A solvent-free solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) has the advantages of being safe, inexpensive and barrier-free for large battery production. However, polyether-based SPEs are believed to oxidize at >4 V. Carbon-based anodes are also thought to be incompatible with polyether-based SPEs. Therefore, such SPEs are now in categorized as traditional electrolytes. However, we demonstrated (i) the compatibility of 4 V-5 V cathodes, such as LiCoO2 1) and LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 2), by modifying the cathode and polyether-based SPE interface and (ii) sufficient graphite reversibility with the SPE using suitably prepared electrodes. Recently, we drastically improved the cycle operation (>1,500 cycles) of LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 (NMC)3) and graphite using an optimized lithium salt and by introducing carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) at the interface. These materials are already mass produced; therefore, the active material cost will be equivalent to conventional lithium-ion batteries. There are no flammable vapors in the electrolyte (a pure polymer rather than a gel); therefore, an intrinsic safety improvement is expected for abused cells. In addition, a simple, multi-cell design using one external package is another advantage of all solid state batteries. Based on these advantages and renovations, we readopted such traditional SPE systems for stationary batteries. Here, we further improved the cycle performance by adding a new lithium salt and demonstrated the long term operation of a [Graphite | SPE | NMC] × 3 stack 12 V single-package multi-cell. Experimental The electrode materials were mixed with CMC, styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) and conductive additives in a solvent without any SPEs before coating on the current collector. Subsequently, a polyether-based SPE (M=1.5 M, Daiso Co., Ltd.) was overcoated on the electrode using acetonitrile (AN). LiBF4 was used in the overcoat solution for NMC. In contrast, LiTFSI was used in the overcoat solution for graphite and the SPE sheet between the two electrodes. A lithium-ion cell composed of NMC, SPE, and graphite was fabricated using an Al-laminate-type cell. For the multi-cell, three cells (effective surface area 10 ×10 cm) were stacked in series in one package. All cells operated at 50°C. Results and Discussion We added 5 % LiBOB to the NMC overcoat solution. This LiBOB additive remarkably improved the reversibility, as shown in Fig. 1. The LiBOB additive was reported to suppress Al corrosion and/or Mn dissolution. While the detailed mechanism for these improvements is currently being studied, the high retention capacity obtained (70 % at 3,000 cycles) is practical for stationary use. Furthermore, over 1,000 operating cycles were successfully performed using a 10×10 cm three stack 12 V multi-cell, as shown in Fig. 2. The stacked multi-cell was vacuum sealed so no additional pressure was required during operations, which is significant progress for a large format battery design. References Y. Kobayashi et al., Journal of Power Sources, 146, 719 (2005). H. Miyashiro et al., Electrochem. Commun., 7, 1083 (2005). T. Kobayashi et al., ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 5, 12387 (2013). H. Xie et al., Electrochem. Solid State Lett., 11, C19 (2008). M. Xu et al., J. Electrochem. Soc., 160, A2005 (2013).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».