A Long-Life 3-Stack 12 V Dry Polymer Battery Using LiNi<sub>1/3</sub>Mn<sub>1/3</sub>Co<sub>1/3</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and Graphite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Safety is more important than high energy in stationary batteries. In addition, material choices based on the low-cost and easy production of larger batteries is another critical issue for developing large energy storage systems comparable to pumped hydro systems. A solvent-free solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) has the advantages of being safe, inexpensive and barrier-free for large battery production. However, polyether-based SPEs are believed to oxidize at >4 V. Carbon-based anodes are also thought to be incompatible with polyether-based SPEs. Therefore, such SPEs are now in categorized as traditional electrolytes. However, we demonstrated (i) the compatibility of 4 V-5 V cathodes, such as LiCoO2 1) and LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 2), by modifying the cathode and polyether-based SPE interface and (ii) sufficient graphite reversibility with the SPE using suitably prepared electrodes. Recently, we drastically improved the cycle operation (>1,500 cycles) of LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 (NMC)3) and graphite using an optimized lithium salt and by introducing carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) at the interface. These materials are already mass produced; therefore, the active material cost will be equivalent to conventional lithium-ion batteries. There are no flammable vapors in the electrolyte (a pure polymer rather than a gel); therefore, an intrinsic safety improvement is expected for abused cells. In addition, a simple, multi-cell design using one external package is another advantage of all solid state batteries. Based on these advantages and renovations, we readopted such traditional SPE systems for stationary batteries. Here, we further improved the cycle performance by adding a new lithium salt and demonstrated the long term operation of a [Graphite | SPE | NMC] × 3 stack 12 V single-package multi-cell. Experimental The electrode materials were mixed with CMC, styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) and conductive additives in a solvent without any SPEs before coating on the current collector. Subsequently, a polyether-based SPE (M=1.5 M, Daiso Co., Ltd.) was overcoated on the electrode using acetonitrile (AN). LiBF4 was used in the overcoat solution for NMC. In contrast, LiTFSI was used in the overcoat solution for graphite and the SPE sheet between the two electrodes. A lithium-ion cell composed of NMC, SPE, and graphite was fabricated using an Al-laminate-type cell. For the multi-cell, three cells (effective surface area 10 ×10 cm) were stacked in series in one package. All cells operated at 50°C. Results and Discussion We added 5 % LiBOB to the NMC overcoat solution. This LiBOB additive remarkably improved the reversibility, as shown in Fig. 1. The LiBOB additive was reported to suppress Al corrosion and/or Mn dissolution. While the detailed mechanism for these improvements is currently being studied, the high retention capacity obtained (70 % at 3,000 cycles) is practical for stationary use. Furthermore, over 1,000 operating cycles were successfully performed using a 10×10 cm three stack 12 V multi-cell, as shown in Fig. 2. The stacked multi-cell was vacuum sealed so no additional pressure was required during operations, which is significant progress for a large format battery design. References Y. Kobayashi et al., Journal of Power Sources, 146, 719 (2005). H. Miyashiro et al., Electrochem. Commun., 7, 1083 (2005). T. Kobayashi et al., ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 5, 12387 (2013). H. Xie et al., Electrochem. Solid State Lett., 11, C19 (2008). M. Xu et al., J. Electrochem. Soc., 160, A2005 (2013).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".