Latent HIV-1 can be reactivated by superinfection in a Tat-dependent manner, which can lead to the emergence of recombinant viruses
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The HIV-1 latent reservoir represents an important source of genetic diversity that could contribute to viral evolution and drug resistance. Latent virus reactivation might occur by superinfection of latently infected cells. Previous studies have suggested that latent viruses contribute to recombination in vivo , but this has not been experimentally studied. We used both Jurkat and primary cell latency models. In Jurkat cells, wt and drug-resistant latent populations were superinfected with wt or drug-resistant viruses, including nef or tat mutants, and treated with various inhibitors. Viral reporter gene expression was measured by FACS. Sequence tags on each resistant virus permitted identification of recombinants. We also performed superinfection experiments in primary cells. Latent viruses were reactivated by superinfection in both latency models. In Jurkat cells, the extent of latent virus reactivation was strongly correlated (r = 0.98) with the extent of superinfection across a wide range of viral inocula. Latent virus reactivation required gene expression of the superinfecting virus, since latent viruses were reactivated in the presence of a protease inhibitor, but not a reverse transcriptase (RT) or integrase inhibitor. Latent virus reactivation occurred following superinfection with nef-deleted or tat-attenuated, but not tat-inactivated, viruses. These results suggest that neither gp120-induced CD4/CXCR4 signalling nor Nef-induced NFkB/NFAT modulation were required for latent virus reactivation, but that superinfecting virus Tat was required. Drug-resistant latent viruses (RT K103N) were reactivated following superinfection with additional drug resistant viruses (RT M184V). The resulting supernatants (containing heterozygous virions) were used to infect new cells, to which the RT inhibitors FTC and EFV were added. Sequencing and restriction digestion confirmed that recombination frequently occurred, leading to FTC/EFV-resistant virions encoding unique sequence tags derived from both parental viruses. We also established latency in unstimulated primary CD4T-cells and subjected them to superinfection. Results from nine individual donors indicate that latent viruses were reactivated by superinfection; these results were statistically significant (p=0.001). Our results suggest that superinfection of latently infected cells can reactivate latent viruses, which can then recombine with the superinfecting virus. Since all viral quasispecies including drug-resistant viruses can be latently archived, reactivation of latent viruses by superinfection or other means could contribute to the emergence of replicatively fit viruses in the face of strong selective pressures.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».