MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2283363649

CVMA presidency: Why?

2008· article· en· W2283363649 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Diane Frank

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed Central · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueVeterinary Practice and Education Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrivate practiceFlexibility (engineering)MedicinePresidencyService (business)Public relationsMedical educationPolitical scienceVeterinary medicineManagementFamily medicineBusinessLawMarketing
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As I pondered about potential topics for my first President’s Message, I also reflected on my career as a veterinarian. Twenty five years already… how time flies! Did I ever expect that one day I would become president of the CVMA? Never! But then, as previous CVMA presidents have already written, veterinary medicine is a profession that offers so many possibilities and challenges. When I first applied to veterinary school, I believed that I would become a lifetime private practitioner in companion animal practice. I initially did not want to become a practice owner as I wanted to keep some flexibility with job location. I worked as an employee for 2 years then did locums for a year and a half, before starting up a new veterinary practice along with another veterinarian. Five years later, my business partner sold his share. After 13 years in private practice, I chose to return to university to complete a residency in animal behavior. The idea was to offer a new service within my practice. I never expected to enjoy working with veterinary students as much as I did during the residency. I then considered the possibility of academia. I sold my practice and started a new chapter in my career. What a great profession with so many opportunities! During a department meeting there was an announcement that the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association (CVMA) was looking for a faculty representative on Council. My attention and interest were sparked by the comments of another CVMA past-president who mentioned that the CVMA had an active Animal Welfare Committee. I was hooked! On Council I met wonderful colleagues from every province and different fields of practice. Coming from a French speaking province, I was naive enough to think that Quebec was different from the rest of Canada. I discovered that each province is unique. First lesson learned. Even though I come from a province where membership is not mandatory, I have always believed in the importance of a national veterinary association and have been a CVMA member since graduation (the only exception being the years spent in the United States). Why? I am unable to picture Canada without a national veterinary association. Without members there is no association. Without an association, there is little strength. I am also a long-time member of l’Academie de Medecine Veterinaire du Quebec (AMVQ), the association of companion animal private practitioners in Quebec. Each association fulfills different but complementary roles. I believe in the power of associations! An Australian Veterinary Association (AVA) past-president told me that the learning curve during my presidency year would be steep. I also read a similar comment written by CVMA past-president Peter Fretz. Before deciding on the topic of my first message, I decided to read the President Messages within The Canadian Veterinary Journal from January 1998 to March 2008 to get a sense of past issues and topics. Many of the subjects I had thought of addressing had already been discussed (recognition of the work of volunteers on committees; the luck we have to practise veterinary medicine in Canada; the wonderful aspects of our profession, etc.). I found it comforting to read that in July 1999, Dr. Fretz had had “serious second thoughts, reservations and sleepless nights worrying about whether or not he would successfully rise to the occasion of being president of the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association.” I can certainly relate to all those feelings and concerns and am glad to hear I am not the only one who has felt some anguish. Another past-president, Dr. Duane Landals wrote in November 2003 that “courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the strength to overcome it.” I am certainly out of my comfort zone to say the least! But then again, I seem to thrive with new challenges. CVMA president: Why? I believe in our profession and our association. I am privileged and honored to represent the veterinarians of Canada and will be on my best behavior for this mandate! I am ready for future lessons.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,995
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,224

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,021
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,002
Communication savante0,0120,007
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0130,018
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0670,028

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,306
Tête enseignante GPT0,434
Écart entre enseignants0,128 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMed CentralMême sujetVeterinary Practice and Education StudiesTravaux en français237 207