MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2283363649

CVMA presidency: Why?

2008· article· en· W2283363649 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Diane Frank

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicVeterinary Practice and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrivate practiceFlexibility (engineering)MedicinePresidencyService (business)Public relationsMedical educationPolitical scienceVeterinary medicineManagementFamily medicineBusinessLawMarketing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As I pondered about potential topics for my first President’s Message, I also reflected on my career as a veterinarian. Twenty five years already… how time flies! Did I ever expect that one day I would become president of the CVMA? Never! But then, as previous CVMA presidents have already written, veterinary medicine is a profession that offers so many possibilities and challenges. When I first applied to veterinary school, I believed that I would become a lifetime private practitioner in companion animal practice. I initially did not want to become a practice owner as I wanted to keep some flexibility with job location. I worked as an employee for 2 years then did locums for a year and a half, before starting up a new veterinary practice along with another veterinarian. Five years later, my business partner sold his share. After 13 years in private practice, I chose to return to university to complete a residency in animal behavior. The idea was to offer a new service within my practice. I never expected to enjoy working with veterinary students as much as I did during the residency. I then considered the possibility of academia. I sold my practice and started a new chapter in my career. What a great profession with so many opportunities! During a department meeting there was an announcement that the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association (CVMA) was looking for a faculty representative on Council. My attention and interest were sparked by the comments of another CVMA past-president who mentioned that the CVMA had an active Animal Welfare Committee. I was hooked! On Council I met wonderful colleagues from every province and different fields of practice. Coming from a French speaking province, I was naive enough to think that Quebec was different from the rest of Canada. I discovered that each province is unique. First lesson learned. Even though I come from a province where membership is not mandatory, I have always believed in the importance of a national veterinary association and have been a CVMA member since graduation (the only exception being the years spent in the United States). Why? I am unable to picture Canada without a national veterinary association. Without members there is no association. Without an association, there is little strength. I am also a long-time member of l’Academie de Medecine Veterinaire du Quebec (AMVQ), the association of companion animal private practitioners in Quebec. Each association fulfills different but complementary roles. I believe in the power of associations! An Australian Veterinary Association (AVA) past-president told me that the learning curve during my presidency year would be steep. I also read a similar comment written by CVMA past-president Peter Fretz. Before deciding on the topic of my first message, I decided to read the President Messages within The Canadian Veterinary Journal from January 1998 to March 2008 to get a sense of past issues and topics. Many of the subjects I had thought of addressing had already been discussed (recognition of the work of volunteers on committees; the luck we have to practise veterinary medicine in Canada; the wonderful aspects of our profession, etc.). I found it comforting to read that in July 1999, Dr. Fretz had had “serious second thoughts, reservations and sleepless nights worrying about whether or not he would successfully rise to the occasion of being president of the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association.” I can certainly relate to all those feelings and concerns and am glad to hear I am not the only one who has felt some anguish. Another past-president, Dr. Duane Landals wrote in November 2003 that “courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the strength to overcome it.” I am certainly out of my comfort zone to say the least! But then again, I seem to thrive with new challenges. CVMA president: Why? I believe in our profession and our association. I am privileged and honored to represent the veterinarians of Canada and will be on my best behavior for this mandate! I am ready for future lessons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.002
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0130.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.306
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.128 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicVeterinary Practice and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207