MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2287528993 · doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1089826

Hindu Nationalism in Action: The Bharatiya Janata Party and Indian Politics

2015· article· en· W2287528993 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueSouth Asia Journal of South Asian Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueIndian Economic and Social Development
Établissements canadiensSimon Fraser University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHindu nationalismHinduismNationalismPoliticsHindutvaPolitical scienceAction (physics)Gender studiesPolitical actionReligious studiesSociologyLawPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

India went to the polls in a general election in AprilÀMay 2014.The prime ministerial candidate of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Narendra Modi, was pitted against Rahul Gandhi (great-grandson of India's first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru), who led India's long-standing party of government, the Indian National Congress, which had headed a coalition government over the previous ten years.Mr. Modi was a controversial figure because, as chief minister of the state of Gujarat (2001À14), he had been in charge of a government that was widely considered to have been responsible for the deaths of many Muslims in 2002 in the most serious outbreak of violence between Hindus and Muslims that independent India had experienced.The events of that year have been described as a 'pogrom'.But, drawing on his considerable rhetorical skills, 1 and the reputation he had established for the success of the Gujarat 'Model for Development', as he called it, 2 Modi successfully projected himself as capable of delivering on the promise of national economic development after what were represented as years of stagnation and corruption under the Congress.Christophe Jaffrelot, in his contribution to this special issue, refers to the description of Gujarat's economic success under Modi as 'miraculous'.This panegyric was suggested by Arvind Panagariya, professor of economics at Columbia University and appointed as the first vice chairman of the NITI Aayog, which has now replaced the Planning Commission 3 (a change discussed in her article here by Mitu Sengupta).The promise of rapid economic development, together with the idea that he would promote 'Minimum Government, Maximum Governance' (discussed in this collection by Sanjay Ruparelia), was a message that was very successfully projected to the electorate, via Modi's own speeches across the country and through a skilful use of media, including social media.This effort was massively funded by major corporate groups.The BJP campaign was focused around Modi and resembled that of an American presidential candidate in a way that had never happened before in India.It was supported by the extent of the control exercised by the BJP over a significant fraction of the media.In the event, Modi won an extraordinary victory.The Congress was reduced to a small rump in the new parliament, and for the first time in a quarter of a century, a single party secured an absolute majority in the Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian parliament.This confounded the expectations of many astute observers who had reckoned that the coalition arrangements entered into by strongly-supported regional political parties would continue to 1 Modi's rhetorical skills are widely applauded in the press, but not recognised by all.It has also been said that he reverts to rustic sarcasm in a way that is unbecoming of a national leader (Andrew Wyatt, personal communication, 10 July 2015). 2'How did Gujarat Emerge as a Model for Development?' [http://www.narendramodi.in/how-did-gujaratemerge-as-a-model-for-development,accessed 7 July 2015).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,044
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,528

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,125
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,158 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle