MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2289282082 · doi:10.14288/1.0090613

Risk factors for drug addiction among youth in the Vancouver Downtown East Side : a drug users’ perspective

2009· article· en· W2289282082 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Iris Maimon-Toledano

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPerspective (graphical)DowntownDrugAddictionEcstasyMedicinePsychiatryArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The purpose of this thesis was to investigate the phenomenon of drug addiction among youth (aged 13-24 years old) in the Vancouver Downtown East Side (DTES). It was aimed at creating a profile of drug using youth in a local context by understanding their characteristics and the issues affecting their lives; and to learn, partially from the youths' perspective, what were the factors that contributed to the development of addiction in their lives. It also allowed for the expression of the needs of the youths who are affected by drugs and the associated lifestyle, and what they perceive as a potentially effective addiction prevention and intervention program. Thirty one drug using youth who were involved in the DTES were recruited, and personal interviews took place over a period of two months. Interviews were based on a 72 item questionnaire that consisted of open ended questions (aimed at personal perspectives of the participants) and probing, structured questions (based on previous research in the field). The information that was gathered was analyzed on qualitative and quantitative levels, presenting testimonies from participants' life experiences and personal perspectives on addiction. The data were further analyzed with descriptive statistics, correlation tests using Pearson's r, and comparisons between groups of participants using t test for independent means. The study produced a large amount of material. Among the primary findings were the facts that most of the participants were homeless males, who arrived in Vancouver from other provinces, prostituted to support their addiction, and who were involved in the DTES almost solely because of the availability of drugs in the area. A distinction was noted between youth who were associated more with the Granville Street area, who used primarily crystal-methamphetamine, and who prostituted in the West End, versus youth who were more associated with the DTES, used crack, cocaine, or heroin, and prostituted in the area as well. Primary findings pertaining to identified risk factors for drug addiction included the finding of removal from home by social services and upbringing by multiple caregivers among most of the participants; experience of physical or sexual abuse; parental substance abuse; and using drugs as a coping strategy. When examining correlations between different risk factors that were identified in the research, association was found between certain indicators of home atmosphere and dynamics within the family; between parental supervision and children's involvement with violence; and between children's popularity in school and their association with violent activities. Some of the results of comparisons between groups using t tests suggested differences in involvement with violent activities among prostituting youth versus drug dealing youth; greater negative characteristics of child-parent relationships, home atmosphere, and family functioning among children of alcoholic parents; and earlier cigarette smoking among children of drug addicted parents and among children that were placed in out of home care. The study produced a number of conclusions and recommendations for practice and social policy. Among the primary conclusions were the need to provide young children and youth with opportunities to develop and maintain meaningful relationships with their biological family as well as positive relationships with peers; a need to reduce the availability of drugs in the city; and a need to create long term and holistic treatment services for youth.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,351
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,705

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,001
Communication savante0,0020,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,194
Écart entre enseignants0,184 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Même sujetSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes→Travaux en français237 207→