MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2289949313 · doi:10.1353/lm.2015.0023

Articulations of Care: Motherhood, Memoir, Disability

2015· article· en· W2289949313 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrea Charise

Notice bibliographique

RevueLiterature and medicine · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEmpathy and Medical Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMemoirLife writingNarrativePoliticsPsychoanalysisDisability studiesScholarshipSociologyBiographyGriefGender studiesHistoryPsychologyArt historyLawArtLiteraturePolitical sciencePsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Articulations of Care:Motherhood, Memoir, Disability Andrea Charise (bio) Rachel Adams. Raising Henry: A Memoir of Motherhood, Disability, and Discovery. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2013. xii + 258 pp. Hardcover, $26.00. Donna Thomson. The Four Walls of My Freedom: Lessons I’ve Learned from a Life of Caregiving. Foreword by John Ralston Saul. Toronto: House of Anansi Press, 2014. 285 pp. Paperback, $19.95. Stories of health, illness, and ability often speak to the overlaying of political and personal spheres of experience. The purpose and providence of such representations motivates much scholarship in the field of health humanities, especially in critical explorations of the apparent transparency of first-person or non-fictional writing. Is the memoir’s aim to recount the writer’s own narrative of patienthood? Is it to instruct a reader’s navigation of similar experiences? Is it to indicate the need for social and political change—or even to agitate for them? This genre’s strongly purposive quality is amplified in the case of the family or parent memoir, an increasingly prevalent kind of life writing primarily focused on the experience of parenting a child with disabilities. Beginning with chronicles including Jane Bernstein’s Loving Rachel: A Family’s Journey from Grief (1988) and Michael Bérubé’s Life As We Know It: A Father, a Family, and an Exceptional Child (1996), [End Page 428] the parent memoir has recently flourished and consolidated around its own discernible conventions, especially the evolution of parental grief into advocacy for a non-medical or social model of disability. Another critical feature is the parental memoir’s invocation (and often discussion) of the ethical conundrums of representation and consent. As Alison Piepmeier and others have observed, the parent memoir presents an especially challenging literary genre given its unsettled relationship to the aims and values of disability studies.1 It is difficult not to think of the parent memoir as the material outcome of an inescapably utilitarian calculus, since its publication must in some sense outweigh the medical-ethical values of confidentiality, privacy, and the autonomy of its (often child or adolescent) subject. For readers interested in disability’s situation within studies of literature and medicine, this reality connotes a duty to answer: Why write a parent memoir? Why read it? And most urgently in the case of the memoir inspired by the child with disabilities: who benefits? Rachel Adams and Donna Thomson have recently published memoirs that provocatively engage these questions. In Raising Henry, Adams (a professor of English at Columbia University) chronicles the first three years after the birth of her son with Down syndrome. Thomson, who spent much of her life in the Canadian Foreign Service, writes in The Four Walls of My Freedom of her son Nicholas who was born with cerebral palsy and is now in his mid-twenties. Putting aside their differences for a moment, these eminently readable memoirs are also striking for their shared aims, textual strategies, and even narrative episodes. Both authors recount the shock of their child’s diagnosis and the trauma of improperly inserting an infant’s feeding tube. Both describe their negotiation of resource-strapped services and rally hard against the tragedy narrative of disability. The loneliness of motherhood, exacerbated by callous medicalized and social isolations imposed upon each author’s child, is matched by episodes of profound contentment and pleasure; both Adams and Thomson describe touching moments of shared intimacy involving the ritual of baking and eating birthday cake with their sons, and indicate their appreciation for past memoirists (including Bérubé, Eva Feder Kittay, and Emily Perl Kingsley) whose experiences parenting children with disabilities amount to an activistintellectual community and virtual caregiver network. By testifying to their authors’ multiple postpartum transformations of identity, Raising Henry and The Four Walls of My Freedom are worthy additions to the parent memoir genre. Their value is especially apparent in the distinct ways Adams and Thomson apply the insights of the humanities to [End Page 429] reimagine care as a deeply embodied yet textual act, in which the literary imagination becomes a crucial facilitator of care for the child born with disabilities. Raising Henry is born out of an almost improbable...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,626
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,217

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,324
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueLiterature and medicineMême sujetEmpathy and Medical EducationTravaux en français237 207