MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289949313 · doi:10.1353/lm.2015.0023

Articulations of Care: Motherhood, Memoir, Disability

2015· article· en· W2289949313 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrea Charise

Bibliographic record

VenueLiterature and medicine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmpathy and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirLife writingNarrativePoliticsPsychoanalysisDisability studiesScholarshipSociologyBiographyGriefGender studiesHistoryPsychologyArt historyLawArtLiteraturePolitical sciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Articulations of Care:Motherhood, Memoir, Disability Andrea Charise (bio) Rachel Adams. Raising Henry: A Memoir of Motherhood, Disability, and Discovery. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2013. xii + 258 pp. Hardcover, $26.00. Donna Thomson. The Four Walls of My Freedom: Lessons I’ve Learned from a Life of Caregiving. Foreword by John Ralston Saul. Toronto: House of Anansi Press, 2014. 285 pp. Paperback, $19.95. Stories of health, illness, and ability often speak to the overlaying of political and personal spheres of experience. The purpose and providence of such representations motivates much scholarship in the field of health humanities, especially in critical explorations of the apparent transparency of first-person or non-fictional writing. Is the memoir’s aim to recount the writer’s own narrative of patienthood? Is it to instruct a reader’s navigation of similar experiences? Is it to indicate the need for social and political change—or even to agitate for them? This genre’s strongly purposive quality is amplified in the case of the family or parent memoir, an increasingly prevalent kind of life writing primarily focused on the experience of parenting a child with disabilities. Beginning with chronicles including Jane Bernstein’s Loving Rachel: A Family’s Journey from Grief (1988) and Michael Bérubé’s Life As We Know It: A Father, a Family, and an Exceptional Child (1996), [End Page 428] the parent memoir has recently flourished and consolidated around its own discernible conventions, especially the evolution of parental grief into advocacy for a non-medical or social model of disability. Another critical feature is the parental memoir’s invocation (and often discussion) of the ethical conundrums of representation and consent. As Alison Piepmeier and others have observed, the parent memoir presents an especially challenging literary genre given its unsettled relationship to the aims and values of disability studies.1 It is difficult not to think of the parent memoir as the material outcome of an inescapably utilitarian calculus, since its publication must in some sense outweigh the medical-ethical values of confidentiality, privacy, and the autonomy of its (often child or adolescent) subject. For readers interested in disability’s situation within studies of literature and medicine, this reality connotes a duty to answer: Why write a parent memoir? Why read it? And most urgently in the case of the memoir inspired by the child with disabilities: who benefits? Rachel Adams and Donna Thomson have recently published memoirs that provocatively engage these questions. In Raising Henry, Adams (a professor of English at Columbia University) chronicles the first three years after the birth of her son with Down syndrome. Thomson, who spent much of her life in the Canadian Foreign Service, writes in The Four Walls of My Freedom of her son Nicholas who was born with cerebral palsy and is now in his mid-twenties. Putting aside their differences for a moment, these eminently readable memoirs are also striking for their shared aims, textual strategies, and even narrative episodes. Both authors recount the shock of their child’s diagnosis and the trauma of improperly inserting an infant’s feeding tube. Both describe their negotiation of resource-strapped services and rally hard against the tragedy narrative of disability. The loneliness of motherhood, exacerbated by callous medicalized and social isolations imposed upon each author’s child, is matched by episodes of profound contentment and pleasure; both Adams and Thomson describe touching moments of shared intimacy involving the ritual of baking and eating birthday cake with their sons, and indicate their appreciation for past memoirists (including Bérubé, Eva Feder Kittay, and Emily Perl Kingsley) whose experiences parenting children with disabilities amount to an activistintellectual community and virtual caregiver network. By testifying to their authors’ multiple postpartum transformations of identity, Raising Henry and The Four Walls of My Freedom are worthy additions to the parent memoir genre. Their value is especially apparent in the distinct ways Adams and Thomson apply the insights of the humanities to [End Page 429] reimagine care as a deeply embodied yet textual act, in which the literary imagination becomes a crucial facilitator of care for the child born with disabilities. Raising Henry is born out of an almost improbable...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.025
Scholarly communication0.0140.013
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLiterature and medicineSame topicEmpathy and Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207