Monstrous brains and puny bodies: the struggle for female physicians in Canada 1800-1950
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The end result of medical education for women as said by a male medical professor in 1873 was 'monstrous brains and puny bodies.'It is obvious from this quote that the path for a woman to become a doctor was not easy and it can be said that every 19 th century female doctor in Canada was a pioneer for the future of Canadian medicine.The prevailing view of women at this time was that women were the Almighty's special creations and were susceptible to a multitude of emotional and nervous disorders.The perseverance of a few dedicated women in the mid-19 th century paved the way for females to be able to be educated and practice medicine in Canada.As a woman, there were many struggles and obstacles to be faced in becoming a medical doctor. PioneeringCanadian women in the field of medicine include the first female physician in Canada, Dr. James Miranda Stuart Barry; the founders of the first medical colleges for women, Dr. Emily Stowe and Dr. Jennie Trout; and Dr. Maude Abbott, a leader in the field of research on congenital heart disease.Obstacles that these women faced included being allowed to enter into medical school and practice in Canada, social stigma from male counterparts and the general public and the way the profession was run itself posed challenges.In overcoming these struggles, these and many other women made great contributions and strides in medicine and in the feminist movement itself in Canada.The end result of medical education for women as said by a male medical professor in 1873 was 'monstrous brains and puny bodies' (Wynn, 2000).It is obvious from this quote that the path to becoming a doctor for women was not easy and it can be said that every 19 th century female doctor was a pioneer.The prevailing view of women during the 1800s was that women were the Almighty's special creations and were susceptible to a multitude of emotional and nervous disorders (Abram 1985).The resistance for women to pursue medicine is based on the male antagonist notion of sentiment and practicality.This is the notion of an idealized womanhood -that medicine was not for women because the world itself was not for them and that only ~ 62 ~
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».