MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2293619837 · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000481105.48751.f3

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

2016· article· en· W2293619837 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter C. Neligan

Notice bibliographique

RevuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueUrological Disorders and Treatments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReconstructive surgeryMedicineBattleSurgeryHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As a service to our readers, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® reviews books, DVDs, practice management software, and electronic media items of educational interest to reconstructive and aesthetic surgeons. All items are copyrighted and available commercially. The Journal actively solicits information in digital format for review. Reviewers are selected on the basis of relevant interest. Reviews are solely the opinion of the reviewer; they are usually published as submitted, with only copy editing. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® does not endorse or recommend any review so published. Send books, DVDs, and any other material for consideration to: Arun K. Gosain, M.D., Review Editor, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brookriver Executive Center, 8150 Brookriver Drive, Suite S-415, Dallas, Texas 75247. Arun K. Gosain, M.D. Review EditorFigureWhen a new book is added to the lengthy list of plastic surgery titles, it is an uphill battle to have it accepted as useful and enduring. I think the editors have achieved that with this title. This textbook is aimed at the trainee and young plastic surgeon, but it is extremely comprehensive and sufficiently detailed for any practitioner. The information is succinct, yet complete and up to date. There are more than 150 contributors, and the most striking thing about this book is that even though many of the usual big names appear in the contributor list, there are also many newcomers and relatively young contributors. This gives the whole book a fresh feel, and the standard of the chapters is consistently good. For a single-volume book, the detailed knowledge presented is impressive. For example, chapter 44, Genitourinary and Perineal Reconstruction, includes a segment on transgender surgery as well as hypospadias repair, something that, unfortunately, is lost to plastic surgery in the United States. It is also very up to date. Chapter 47, to highlight just one, discusses lymphedema and includes descriptions of conservative treatment as well as both excisional and physiologic operations, along with a discussion on indocyanine green lymphography and other diagnostic modalities. This is an emerging field in our specialty, and yet it is covered very comprehensively. The last section of the book interestingly contains chapters on military plastic surgery, simulation training, and plastic surgery fellowship and board examinations. The latter discusses the English F.R.C.S.(Plast.) Examination, the Australian F.R.A.C.S.(Plast.)/E.B.O.P.R.A.S. (the European Board), and the Canadian F.R.C.S.C. Unfortunately, the American board examinations are not discussed. Nevertheless, this is a useful chapter for trainees, providing tips for examination preparation as well as useful tips about the examinations themselves. This chapter will be very much appreciated by trainee plastic surgeons. The book comes with a dedicated website; the URL is given in the frontmatter of the book. This gives the reader access to all of the illustrations in the book in PowerPoint format. The images can be searched by chapter or resource. Since the list of resources includes only figures, both searches lead to the same page, so they are essentially the same. These images can be downloaded, however, which is a very useful feature for someone preparing rounds or a presentation. The Table of Contents can also be accessed from the web page. When I opened the link, I was excited as I was sure the titles of the chapter would be given, since the search of figures just refers to chapter numbers. Unfortunately, the Table of Contents does the same. This means that to access the figures for a particular chapter, one must know the chapter number to be accessed. This may be something that Wiley could fix easily, as it would make the web page a lot more user-friendly. The figures in the book are good, though some are a little small. However, packing so much information into a single volume likely necessitates this. The photographs are of variable quality, and I was surprised to see that even some of the photographs from the “big names” were not great. This is nitpicking, however, as the overall quality is very good. I think this is a great book. It is packed with good and up-to-date information, and I think it will be an invaluable resource for trainees but also for all plastic surgeons. The editors are to be congratulated on achieving a very difficult task with such success.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,153
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,234
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgeryMême sujetUrological Disorders and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207