Static and pseudo-static stability analysis of tailings storage facilities using deterministic and probabilistic methods
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Tailings facilities are vast man-made structures designed and built for the storage and management of mill effluents throughout the life of a mining project. There are different types of tailings storage facilities (TSF) classified in accordance with the method of construction of the embankment and the mechanical properties of the tailings to be stored. The composition of tailings is determined by the mineral processing technique used to obtain the concentrate as well as the physical and chemical properties of the ore body. As a common denominator, TSFs are vulnerable to failure due to design or operational deficiencies, site-specific features, or due to random variables such as material properties, seismic events or unusual precipitation. As a result, long-term risk based stability assessment of mine wastes storage facilities is necessary.The stability analyses of TSFs are traditionally conducted using the Limit Equilibrium Method (LEM). However, it has been demonstrated that relying exclusively on this approach may not warrant full understanding of the behaviour of the TSF because the LEM neglects the stress-deformation constitutive relationships that ensure displacement compatibility. Furthermore, the intrinsic variability of tailings properties is not taken into account either because it is basically a deterministic method. In order to overcome these limitations of the LEM, new methods and techniques have been proposed for slope stability assessment. The Strength Reduction Technique (SRT) based on the Finite Element Method (FEM), for instance, has been successfully applied for this purpose. Likewise, stability assessment with the probabilistic approach has gained more and more popularity in mining engineering because it offers a comprehensive and more realistic estimation of TSFs performance. In the light of the advances in numerical modelling and geotechnical engineering applied to the mining industry, this thesis presents a stability analysis comparison between an upstream tailings storage facility (UTSF), and a water retention tailings dam (WRTD). First, the effect of embankment/tailings height increase on the overall stability is evaluated under static and pseudo-static states. Second, the effect of the phreatic surface location in the UTSF, and the embankment to core permeability ratio in the WRTD are investigated. The analyses are conducted using rigorous and simplified LEMs and the FEM - SRT. In order to take into consideration the effect of the intrinsic variability of tailings properties on stability, parametric analyses are conducted to identify the critical random variables of each TSF. Finally, the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS), and the Point Estimate Method (PEM) are applied to recalculate the FOS and to estimate the probability of failure and reliability indices of each analysis. The results are compared against the minimum static and pseudo-static stability requirements and design guidelines applicable to mining operations in the Province of Quebec, Canada.Keywords: Tailings storage facilities (TSF), Limit Equilibrium Method (LEM), Shear Reduction Technique (SST), pseudo-static seismic coefficient, probability of failure, Point Estimate Method (PEM), Reliability Index.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».