Russian ÉMigrés in the Intellectual and Literary Life of Inter-War France: A Bibliographical Essay
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Leonid Livak. Russian Emigres in the Intellectual and Literary Life of Inter-War France: A Bibliographical Essay. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2010. 542 pp. Bibliography. Appendices. Primary sources. Secondary sources. Index. $125.00, cloth.After being forced to leave their home country, many Russian emigre intellectuals, while facing the hardships and torments of exile, succeeded in making a name for themselves in their host country. During the highly politicized period between the Russian Revolution and the outbreak of World War II, many of these intellectuals established a fruitful dialogue with their French counterparts, assuming visible roles in journalism, culture, literature, and philosophy. Leonid Livak' s book, conceived as a reference source on two decades of continuous relations between Russian emigres and French intelligentsia, wholly fulfills its promise, offering us not only an abundant and comprehensive bibliography, but an insightful essay on the fate and influence of Russia Abroad in inter-bellum France. The 450-page bibliography presents books, memoirs, pamphlets, and especially articles, published in French by - and on - numerous Russian-speaking emigres involved in literary and intellectual activities. It honours those passed on to posterity as well as those fallen into oblivion. If one may regret that there is no short biographic mention of the writers included in the book, nor reference to their numerous writings in Russian and to publications dealing with theatre, music, and visual arts, this bibliography compiles nonetheless an astounding wealth of information: it is a major contribution to the knowledge of Russia Abroad at its apogee and to the study of the process of cultural exchanges at large.The book begins with an introduction whose purpose is to revive exilic studies (p. 4). According to Livak, the study of Russia Abroad has long suffered from two political biases. First, Soviet propaganda disregarded and banished emigres' writings; second, emigre writers tended to tarnish their pre-war experience due to the postwar popularity of the Soviet Union in France, their sense of political isolation reinforcing their tendency to cling to the traditional Russian model of artists and intellectuals as prophets and martyrs (p. 5). The introduction is followed by a short essay, which describes the emigres' entry on the French literaiy scene and discusses their commerce with Russian editors and French intelligentsia. While examining their success and setbacks, Livak delineates four distinct periods. Although thoughtfully contextualized, his periodization of the emigres' francophone activity could have been enhanced had it taken into consideration their productivity in Russian. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».