Skilling or Deskilling: The Study of Job Performance of Returned Migrants from Western Countries
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Every year a significant number of migrants of developing countries i.e. Bangladesh, India and Pakistan are returning to their home countries with new western professional and life skills. The number of returnees has radically increased since 2008 due to government policy and economic downturn. The receiving countries like UK, Australia, US, Canada are changing these migrants’ lifestyle during their stay abroad. However, developing countries worry that, sending many of their highly skilled, educated, students population to overseas is costing them greatly. They lose the money they spent on educating their young people to a high standard, and they may lose those with an entrepreneurial spirit as well. Moreover, recent study says that ‘Most western business management is unskilled in business and in management... as for commitment, we have to admit that it is no longer so easily found in the West, except in knowledge industries, where people enjoy novelty and accomplishment... the West is generally weak on preparation because it is so poor at planning and timing... and neither the very big organizations nor medium-size manufacturers in the West are very good on granting autonomy to small splinter groups, because there is a lack of trust' (Management Crisis and Business Revolution). Conversely, many studies show that in the long-term such migration benefits developing countries more than it harms them. They receive more money back from the migrants who send remittances back home to their families. And when the migrants eventually return, the new skills and technologies they have acquired can be used to boost living standards at home. However, it should be noted that return migration is one of the least well-studied aspects of migration; till today there is a little evidence of empirical research to know what are the skills or abilities the returned migrants are captivating from western countries? Do western countries really contribute in skills development of migrants or they deskill them? Therefore, the impact of returned migration on the development factors and the extent to which returnees use skills they acquired abroad can be difficult to assess. This research is aimed to evaluate the role of western countries in skilling or deskilling the migrants of developing countries and to investigate how those skills or deskills are affecting the labour market performance of developing countries. The proposed study brings together a range of statistics and evidence from the Labour Force Survey in developing countries between 2008 and 2013. The data allow to look at detailed characteristics of the returned migrant population, how they impacting to the local population, and their labour market performance. 400 case studies (returnees) and Interview is administered to both sending and receiving countries employer, migrants who are planning to return in near future, local employees who do not have overseas experience. Literatures on skilling and deskilling, western & Asian professional skills and culture, management style, work process, job sectors is reviewed and surveyed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».