Hamlet the Sign: Russian Translations of Hamlet and Literary Canon Formation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aleksei Semenenko. Hamlet the Sign: Russian Translations of Hamlet and Literary Canon Formation. Stockholm Studies in Russian Literature, vol. 39. Stockholm: University of Stockholm Press, 2007. 198 pp. Cinema stills. Bibliography. Appendices. Index. SEK 293, paper.In this monograph Aleksei Semenenko sets out a methodical examination of the dynamic relationship that exists between the play Hamlet and its multiple manifestations in Russia. It would be hard to overestimate the influence that Russian publication, performance and critical reflection has provided to the world of Hamlet studies, though Semenenko provides a cool-headed interpretation of the propinquitous relationship across time and several theoretical models. The book makes a serious contribution to scholarship in an area that is still insufficiently unexplored - a fact that makes this work all the more compelling given the excess of literature published on other aspects of Shakespeare's famous play.The book is a doctoral dissertation published after the fashion of the European Academy where such works are not fundamentally redrafted as more popular book forms. The format suits this project particularly well. Its detail and inclusion of references - not to mention the crisp architecture of presentation - combine to make the book eminently usable.Chapter one focuses on the theory and method the author will use to make his examination. The approach claims to be based in semiotics and maintains that commitment throughout. The method is defined in terms of its use within the rhetorical structure of the book and is cognizant of its potential blind spots. At times the author seems a touch defensive about the perception of semiotics as an anachronistic form of theoretical practice, but such arguments are quickly left behind. The strengths of the choice of a semiological model become clear when the author attacks the seemingly disparate areas of literature, canonicity, translation and interpretation in a fashion that allows us a practical entry into an English-language study of the Russian life of Hamlet.Chapter two examines the canonicity of the play in the Russian context. Much has been written about the position of Hamlet at the centre of the English literary canon as well as the transposition ofthat position into the romance languages. Significant work has also been performed on the Japanese history of the play, but in very few of those cases does the author present such an intelligent framework for the interplay of a fictional world alive in another language and culture. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».