Flocculation of Fraser River sediments due to pulp mill effluents
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Recently, researchers noted an aggregation phenomenon downstream of a pulp mill effluent discharge. A large quantity of the sediment in the Athabasca River deposited downstream of the discharge of the pulp mill effluent (Krishnappan et al., 1994). This effect may be significant on the Fraser River, where a number of pulp mills along its length discharge effluent. This aggregation phenomenon could not be explained by existing coagulation / flocculation theories, and an experimental investigation was undertaken. Experiments involved simple jar testing and settling tests in settling columns. The jar tests were completed in Prince George using pulp mill effluent, and Fraser River water. Throughout these tests, turbidity measurements were made which resulted in some ambiguity surrounding interpretation of the results. Nonetheless, on addition of pulp mill effluent to river water, it was noted that a reduction in turbidity occurred with respect to expected values immediately after mixing. The magnitude of this turbidity reduction was also shown to be greatest when effluent and river water were mixed in equal proportions. The turbidity reduction was thought to indicate aggregation of solids in the effluent - river water mixture. Settling experiments were completed in a settling column, and measurements of total suspended solids were made. This enabled information regarding settling velocities to be obtained, which are related to aggregate size. It was found that on mixing effluent with a suspension of illite, the settleability of the suspended solids was greatly improved. The same results were not achieved when a suspension of Fraser River sediment and effluent were mixed, and it appeared that the settleability of suspended solids was actually impeded due to the addition of effluent in this instance. An analysis of the field data collected by field researchers (Krishnappan, 1994; Droppo, 1994) was also completed. The analysis completed was more detailed than any previously completed, and indicated that there may be aggregation of particles within the effluent plume of the Northwood mill at Prince George. The degree of aggregation appeared to be slight, and hence not likely to affect the overall transport of suspended solids within the Fraser River.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle