MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2304056360 · doi:10.1353/tt.2016.0009

ATHE Presidential Address

2016· article· en· W2304056360 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patricia Ybarra

Notice bibliographique

RevueTheatre topics · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTheatre and Performance Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTheme (computing)SentenceMeaning (existential)AdverbialVerbPhraseLinguisticsMedia studiesComputer scienceWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligencePsychologySociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ATHE Presidential Address Patricia Ybarra (bio) Our section devoted to content from ATHE 2015 in Montreal begins with Patricia Ybarra’s presidential address. The speech, delivered on August 1, 2015, to a crowded ballroom at the tail end of the Annual Membership Meeting, set the tone not only for her presidency, but also the theme of next year’s conference, “Bodies at Work: Performance, Labor, and ATHE at 30.” Notably, this speech was posted on the ATHE website over much of the fall of 2015, and Theatre Topics’ editorial staff has chosen to archive it as important ephemera. We thank Patti for sharing her important thoughts on academic labor across these various venues. —G.A. When sitting down to write this speech I started where I often do with my students when thinking through a concept that we think is familiar, but is not. In this case, the word whose definition is in question is adjunct. According to Webster’s online dictionary (2015), an adjunct is: 1: Something joined or added to another thing, but not essentially a part of it; 2a: a word or word group that qualifies or completes the meaning of another word or other words and is not itself a main structural element in its sentence; 2b: an adverb or adverbial phrase (heartily in “They ate heartily” or at noon in “We left at noon”) attached to the verb of a clause especially to express a relation of time, place, frequency, degree, or manner. The third definition finally comes to issues in our profession: “An associate or assistant of another or an adjunct faculty member at a college or university.” We are then directed to the second definition if we are interested in adjunct professor: “Added or joined in order to be used with something; added to a teaching staff for only a short time or in a lower position than other staff; [or] added or joined as an accompanying object or circumstance.” The second definition elaborates on this, suggesting that an adjunct is “attached in a subordinate or temporary capacity to a staff.” Webster’s also offers some synonyms as food for thought: “Helper, adjutant, aid, aide, apprentice, assistant, coadjutor, deputy, helpmate, helpmeet, lieutenant, mate, sidekick.” How we journey from adjunct as a term defining grammar, emergent in the late 1580s, to one that in the twenty-first century is primarily used to define labor relations and subordination is hard to trace. It is not hard to recognize, however, adjunct today is a synonym for the contingent laborer in the university, who is often subordinated for no good reason because, in fact, they are essential to education in the United States. I have heard from association members who hate this term contingent, in part because it seemingly slights the very present and permanent contribution these scholars, artists, and teachers are making to the field, to their schools, and perhaps most importantly, to their students. I employ this term not to undermine these contributions, but rather to point out how institutions have made the livelihood of their employees and students contingent, because many institutions have convinced themselves that the only way they can survive in a market economy is to place their employees lives in contingency in order to meet the bottom line. And that is not acceptable. The bitter irony one encounters when looking at the definition of adjunct is that adjunct faculty members are no longer hired “for a short term or in a temporary capacity as staff,” but as a permanent part of the university—forever. [End Page 1] Today, fewer than a quarter of university faculty are full-time tenure and tenure-track members; over 40 percent of instructors are part-time instructors, many of whom receive limited or no benefits usually accorded to full-time tenured, tenure-track, or contract professionals—meaning that what was meant to be temporary is permanent. We are being asked to normalize being contingent: living subject to chance and perpetually dependent on conditions out of our control. Precariousness is being institutionalized. And it effects all of us, even tenured and tenure-track faculty, who are thought to be the lucky ones. I point here to the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,892
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTheatre topicsMême sujetTheatre and Performance StudiesTravaux en français237 207