MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2304056360 · doi:10.1353/tt.2016.0009

ATHE Presidential Address

2016· article· en· W2304056360 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patricia Ybarra

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre topics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)SentenceMeaning (existential)AdverbialVerbPhraseLinguisticsMedia studiesComputer scienceWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligencePsychologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ATHE Presidential Address Patricia Ybarra (bio) Our section devoted to content from ATHE 2015 in Montreal begins with Patricia Ybarra’s presidential address. The speech, delivered on August 1, 2015, to a crowded ballroom at the tail end of the Annual Membership Meeting, set the tone not only for her presidency, but also the theme of next year’s conference, “Bodies at Work: Performance, Labor, and ATHE at 30.” Notably, this speech was posted on the ATHE website over much of the fall of 2015, and Theatre Topics’ editorial staff has chosen to archive it as important ephemera. We thank Patti for sharing her important thoughts on academic labor across these various venues. —G.A. When sitting down to write this speech I started where I often do with my students when thinking through a concept that we think is familiar, but is not. In this case, the word whose definition is in question is adjunct. According to Webster’s online dictionary (2015), an adjunct is: 1: Something joined or added to another thing, but not essentially a part of it; 2a: a word or word group that qualifies or completes the meaning of another word or other words and is not itself a main structural element in its sentence; 2b: an adverb or adverbial phrase (heartily in “They ate heartily” or at noon in “We left at noon”) attached to the verb of a clause especially to express a relation of time, place, frequency, degree, or manner. The third definition finally comes to issues in our profession: “An associate or assistant of another or an adjunct faculty member at a college or university.” We are then directed to the second definition if we are interested in adjunct professor: “Added or joined in order to be used with something; added to a teaching staff for only a short time or in a lower position than other staff; [or] added or joined as an accompanying object or circumstance.” The second definition elaborates on this, suggesting that an adjunct is “attached in a subordinate or temporary capacity to a staff.” Webster’s also offers some synonyms as food for thought: “Helper, adjutant, aid, aide, apprentice, assistant, coadjutor, deputy, helpmate, helpmeet, lieutenant, mate, sidekick.” How we journey from adjunct as a term defining grammar, emergent in the late 1580s, to one that in the twenty-first century is primarily used to define labor relations and subordination is hard to trace. It is not hard to recognize, however, adjunct today is a synonym for the contingent laborer in the university, who is often subordinated for no good reason because, in fact, they are essential to education in the United States. I have heard from association members who hate this term contingent, in part because it seemingly slights the very present and permanent contribution these scholars, artists, and teachers are making to the field, to their schools, and perhaps most importantly, to their students. I employ this term not to undermine these contributions, but rather to point out how institutions have made the livelihood of their employees and students contingent, because many institutions have convinced themselves that the only way they can survive in a market economy is to place their employees lives in contingency in order to meet the bottom line. And that is not acceptable. The bitter irony one encounters when looking at the definition of adjunct is that adjunct faculty members are no longer hired “for a short term or in a temporary capacity as staff,” but as a permanent part of the university—forever. [End Page 1] Today, fewer than a quarter of university faculty are full-time tenure and tenure-track members; over 40 percent of instructors are part-time instructors, many of whom receive limited or no benefits usually accorded to full-time tenured, tenure-track, or contract professionals—meaning that what was meant to be temporary is permanent. We are being asked to normalize being contingent: living subject to chance and perpetually dependent on conditions out of our control. Precariousness is being institutionalized. And it effects all of us, even tenured and tenure-track faculty, who are thought to be the lucky ones. I point here to the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheatre topicsSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207