Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
On Saturday, March 13, 2004, a competition called The Bernoulli Trials was held at the University of Waterloo for the nth time, where n = 8. A total of 55 undergraduate students participated, all sharing insatiable appetites for mathematical problems and freshly baked croissants. The Bernoulli Trials consists of a number of rounds, each of which involves contes tants having to decide whether a mathematical statement is TRUE or FALSE, without the aid of a calculator. Rounds usually last 10 minutes, unless the organizers feel partic ularly malicious or hungry, in which case the round may be shortened (for example to 2 or 5 minutes). At the end of the round, students submit only their decision of TRUE or FALSE, obtained by some combination of skill, intuition and chance. Contestants can continue until they have made two mistakes, whereupon they are eliminated. The competition continues until one contestant is left standing and is declared champion. The 2004 competition lasted a total of 14 rounds, and produced quite an exciting finish. After 8 rounds, only six contestants remained standing, each of whom had an swered one problem incorrectly. So it was sudden death! In round 9, Iouri Khramtsov and Marcin Mika succumbed to sigma-itis and were eliminated. Round 10 saw the elimination of Yuli Ye, leaving only Raymond Chiu, Ralph Furmaniak, and Feng Tian, all of whom then answered correctly in round 11. As round 12 closed, Ralph hastily changed his answer, leaving all three remaining contestants with an incorrect answer. After much deliberation and consultation of the BT Rule Book, the organizers determined that they could not eliminate all three re maining contestants and thus keep the prizes for themselves, so Raymond, Ralph, and Feng continued on. Ralph redeemed himself in round 13 by being the only contestant to answer cor rectly, and so was declared champion. In March 2004, Ralph Furmaniak (from Lon don, ON) was a first-year student and a verter?n of the IMO. It would later be known that Ralph was a Putnam Fellow in the 2003 Putnam Competition. Round 14 was a two-minute tie-breaker for second place, which saw Raymond Chiu prevail as second place finisher, leaving Feng Tian in third place. (Our top-secret proof-reader did assure us that he managed to differentiate the given function 45 times in 1 minute 38 seconds, so 2 minutes seemed a reasonable length of time.) Thankfully,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle