MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2312671291 · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e318212085e

Phase Stability of Auditory Steady State Responses in Newborn Infants

2011· article· en· W2312671291 sur OpenAlexafffund
Jong Min Choi, David W. Purcell, M. Sasha John

Notice bibliographique

RevueEar and Hearing · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoBaycrest HospitalWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Mots-clésAudiologySteady state (chemistry)PopulationMedicineChemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In Brief Objectives: This study examined the phases of auditory steady state responses (ASSRs) evoked by exponentially amplitude-modulated (AM2) tones in 44 newborn infants (within 3 days of birth) and in 15 older infants (within 3 to 15 wks of birth). Our hypothesis was that the phases of the ASSRs would show orderly changes with modulation rate/carrier frequency and that this stability could be used with phase-biasing statistical techniques to augment response detection. Design: Multiple ASSRs were recorded to four modulated tonal carriers with intensities of 50 dB SPL, which were combined and presented simultaneously. The carriers of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz were modulated at rates between 78 and 95 Hz. Recordings lasted 12.3 mins. Data were analyzed offline with particular attention to phase and its possible exploitation in response detection using a phase-weighted t test (PWT). Population normative phase values were compared with self-normative values. The latter uses phase estimates from ASSRs that are detected at an earlier time to estimate expected phases of ASSRs, which have not yet been detected. This was implemented as an interstimulus phase-weighted t test (iPWT). A secondary analysis compared using fixed test durations where data were evaluated once at the end of the recording with variable test durations where data were evaluated after every sweep. Results: Average phases were not statistically different between the newborn and older infants. The mean ASSR phases across both infant groups were 10°, 36°, 83°, and 110° in the left ear and 78°, 97°, 135°, and 138° in the right ear for the four modulated carriers, respectively. Of a total of 172 detected ASSRs across the four carriers, 63% (109/172), 84% (144/172), and 99% (170/172) of the phase values fell within ±30°, ±45°, and ±90° of the population mean values, respectively. Self-normative phase values were slightly closer to actual measured phases, than population normative values. Compared with the F test, with a fixed duration, the iPWT technique did slightly better (71.7% versus 77.1% detected). Compared with the F test, with variable test duration, test time was reduced using the iPWT technique for normal and weighted averaging by 4 and 2.9 sweeps (66 and 48 secs), respectively, while false-positive rates were maintained. Compared with tests that relied on the F-ratio and a fixed time of 12.3 mins, using variable test times and the iPWT approach resulted in a halving of test time, while slightly improving comparable ASSR detection rates (66.7% versus 72.5%). An inter-ear average phase difference of 52° was found, which was not accounted for by modulation rates used for left/right ears. Converting phase to latency yielded similar results to prior studies. Conclusions: The phase responses of ASSRs evoked by AM2 tones are stable in newborn and young infants. When using the multiple auditory steady state response (MASTER) technique, it is possible to employ phase-biasing methods to reduce test time and increase detection rates. Using self-normative intrastimulus phase difference values provides better estimated phases than average population phases for purposes of response detection. This study examined phases of auditory steady state responses (ASSRs) evoked by exponentially amplitude-modulated (AM2) tones in 44 newborns (<3 days) and 15 older infants (3 to 15 wks). ASSR phases showed orderly changes with modulation rate/carrier frequency. This phase stability enables phase-biasing statistics to improve response detection. Compared with F-ratio detection, phase-biasing methods improved detection rates (71.7% versus 77.1%) for fixed-duration tests of 12.3 mins. Variable test times permitted halving of test time, with phase biasing again improving ASSR detection compared with F-ratio (72.5% versus 66.7%). Infant phases are sufficiently stable that phase biasing can serve to improve ASSR testing.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,340
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,445

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,137
Tête enseignante GPT0,332
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations12
Publié2011
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEar and HearingMême sujetHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsTravaux en français237 207