Differing Reactions of Functionalized Hydrocarbons with Cp*M(NO)(alkyl)(η<sup>3</sup>-allyl) Complexes of Molybdenum and Tungsten
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cp*W(NO)(CH 2 CMe 3 )(η 3 -CH 2 CHCHMe) ( 1 ) is known to initiate facile and selective aliphatic C−H bond activations of hydrocarbons at ambient temperatures. Its ability to effect C−H activations of unfunctionalized hydrocarbon portions of more complex molecules containing various functional groups has now been investigated in some detail. In addition, molybdenum analogues of 1 have also been examined in order to see how the C−H activation chemistry is affected when the central metal is changed. Thermolyses of 1 in neat 1-chloropropane, 1-chlorobutane, and 1-bromobutane at room temperature result in activation of the terminal C−H bonds at the end opposite the carbon−halogen linkage and the clean formation of the alkyl-allyl complexes Cp*W(NO)(CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 Cl)(η 3 -CH 2 CHCHMe) ( 2 ), Cp*W(NO)(CH 2 (CH 2 ) 2 CH 2 Cl)(η 3 -CH 2 CHCHMe) ( 3 ), and Cp*W(NO)(CH 2 (CH 2 ) 2 CH 2 Br)(η 3 -CH 2 CHCHMe) ( 4 ), respectively. No reaction occurs with the C−Cl or C−Br bonds in the haloalkanes even though they are weaker than the C−H bonds that are activated. Similarly, treatment of 1 with n -Bu 2 O yields exclusively the terminal sp 3 C−H activated product, Cp*W(NO)((CH 2 ) 4 O(CH 2 ) 3 CH 3 )(η 3 -CH 2 CHCHMe) ( 5 ), whereas the reaction with THF results in the single activation of a secondary sp 3 C−H bond α to the oxygen atom in THF and the formation of Cp*W(NO)(C 4 H 7 O)(η 3 -CH 2 CHCHMe) ( 6 ). Consistently, reaction of 1 with ethylcyclohexane results in preferential activation of one of the primary sp 3 C−H linkages of the ethyl group and the formation of Cp*W(NO)(CH 2 CH 2 C 6 H 11 )(η 3 -CH 2 CHCHMe) ( 7 ). The Cp*Mo(NO)(alkyl)(η 3 -allyl) complexes analogous to 1 are generally thermally unstable and react at or slightly above room temperature. The first member of this family of complexes to be studied was Cp*Mo(NO)(CH 2 CMe 3 )(η 3 -C 3 H 5 ) ( 8 ), whose thermolysis in the presence of pyridine at 35 °C over 3 days leads to the formation of Cp*Mo(NO)(C 5 H 5 N)(η 2 -CH 2 ═CHCH 2 CH 2 - t -Bu) ( 9 ), an η 2 -olefin complex in which the allyl and neopentyl ligands have coupled. The related Cp*Mo(NO)(CH 2 SiMe 3 )(η 3 -CH 2 CHCHMe) complex ( 11 ) exists as a 2:1 mixture of isomers distinguishable by the orientation of the endo, syn allyl ligand. In the less sterically congested major isomer, the methyl group on the allyl ligand is adjacent to the NO ligand, but in the minor isomer the methyl group is adjacent to the more sterically demanding CH 2 SiMe 3 ligand. In general, the thermal reaction of 11 is similar to that of 1 . Spectroscopic monitoring indicates that the loss of TMS from 11 at room temperature results in the formation of a 16 e η 2 -diene intermediate complex that can be trapped with PMe 3 as an 18 e adduct, Cp*Mo(NO)(η 2 -CH 2 ═CHCH═CH 2 )(PMe 3 ) ( 12 ). However, reactions of 11 with various substrates (e.g., pentane, Et 2 O, and mesitylene) all lead to a single product, Cp*Mo(NO)(η 4 - trans -butadiene) ( 13 ). Evidently, the formation of the 18 e butadiene complex is favored over the activation of a relatively electron-poor C−H bond by this molybdenum system. The results of DFT calculations on the model reaction of CpW(NO)(η 2 -CH 2 ═CHCH═CH 2 ) with propane confirm that the rate-determining step is the cleavage of a propane C−H bond and that the activation barrier for terminal activation is 8.6 kJ/mol lower in energy than that for internal activation. All new complexes have been characterized by conventional spectroscopic and analytical methods, and the solid-state molecular structures of complexes 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 13 have been established by X-ray crystallographic analyses.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,025 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».