MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2321099315 · doi:10.1158/1940-6207.prev-08-b67

Abstract B67: Using alternative splicing microarrays to identify potential biomarkers in lung cancer

2008· article· en· W2321099315 sur OpenAlexaff
Christine M. Misquitta-Ali, Ofer Shai, Ni Liu, Qun Pan, Leo Lee, Dave O’Hanlon, Jane McGlade, Ming‐Sound Tsao, Benjamin J. Blencowe

Notice bibliographique

RevueCancer Prevention Research · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueRNA Research and Splicing
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExonAlternative splicingRNA splicingBiologyTranscriptomeGeneGene expression profilingMicroarrayDNA microarrayLung cancerGeneticsAdenocarcinomaMicroarray analysis techniquesExon skippingComputational biologyCancer researchCancerGene expressionPathologyRNAMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract B67 The disruption of alternative splicing (AS) by either mutations in splicing sequences or changes in expression of splicing factors has been linked to many human diseases including cancer but the molecular changes associated with lung tumors are not well understood. Using our established quantitative AS microarray platform we have profiled matched normal and adenocarcinoma tissues from the lungs of 10 patients in order to identify changes at both the AS and transcriptional levels. These profiling experiments show a small set of exons that display pronounced and highly consistent changes between the normal and tumor tissues. This set is distinct from those genes showing changes at the transcriptional level. The results reveal how AS and transcription may be re-programmed during malignant transitions in the lung. Using a custom microarray with sets of exon body and splicing junction probes for profiling ~5000 human cassette alternative exons, we have identified 4 AS events that display pronounced inclusion level differences between normal and adenocarcinoma tissue in at least 80% of patients surveyed. These changes were confirmed by RT-PCR using the original 10 plus an additional 19 patient samples. Interestingly, all 4 of the alternative exons are located in genes that are linked to signaling pathways known to be deregulated in certain cancers. Moreover, these 4 AS events preserve frame and are conserved in mouse tissues, suggesting important functional roles. From the same dataset, a separate set of genes with transcript level changes were detected, consistent with previous findings that non-overlapping sets of genes are regulated at the AS and transcriptional levels, when comparing different tissues or corresponding tissues from different species. In addition to probe sets for profiling AS and transcript levels of the corresponding genes, our microarray contains probes to determine the transcript levels for 465 known and putative splicing factors. While significant changes in the expression levels of defined splicing factors were not detected, we observe changes in expression levels of 3 genes that contain RS domains, a feature of proteins that is predictive of a role in splicing. One of these genes is associated with the Notch pathway and the others are known tumor suppressor genes. We have confirmed that the change in AS for 1 of the target genes results in altered splicing at the protein level in addition to the RNA level changes. Work is in progress to characterize the functional role of this AS event using isoform-specific knockdown and overexpression. The increased expression of the exon-included protein isoform was evident in cell lines derived from both lung and colon cancer. We are currently determining if all 4 AS events occur in tumor tissue from breast and colon cancer patients. Also, we have expanded our profiling of human cancers by using higher density AS microarrays, and by using mRNA samples from additional normal and tumor-derived breast, colon and lung sources. Thus far, we have identified a set of conserved AS events that are consistently associated with lung adenocarcinomas. These are located in genes that function in signaling pathways that play important roles in tumorigenesis. Characterization of these AS events will advance our understanding of the role of splicing in human cancers and may also provide new targets for diagnostic applications as potential biomarkers. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2008;1(7 Suppl):B67.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,161
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,077
Tête enseignante GPT0,463
Écart entre enseignants0,386 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCancer Prevention ResearchMême sujetRNA Research and SplicingTravaux en français237 207