MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321099315 · doi:10.1158/1940-6207.prev-08-b67

Abstract B67: Using alternative splicing microarrays to identify potential biomarkers in lung cancer

2008· article· en· W2321099315 on OpenAlexaff
Christine M. Misquitta-Ali, Ofer Shai, Ni Liu, Qun Pan, Leo Lee, Dave O’Hanlon, Jane McGlade, Ming‐Sound Tsao, Benjamin J. Blencowe

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Prevention Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExonAlternative splicingRNA splicingBiologyTranscriptomeGeneGene expression profilingMicroarrayDNA microarrayLung cancerGeneticsAdenocarcinomaMicroarray analysis techniquesExon skippingComputational biologyCancer researchCancerGene expressionPathologyRNAMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract B67 The disruption of alternative splicing (AS) by either mutations in splicing sequences or changes in expression of splicing factors has been linked to many human diseases including cancer but the molecular changes associated with lung tumors are not well understood. Using our established quantitative AS microarray platform we have profiled matched normal and adenocarcinoma tissues from the lungs of 10 patients in order to identify changes at both the AS and transcriptional levels. These profiling experiments show a small set of exons that display pronounced and highly consistent changes between the normal and tumor tissues. This set is distinct from those genes showing changes at the transcriptional level. The results reveal how AS and transcription may be re-programmed during malignant transitions in the lung. Using a custom microarray with sets of exon body and splicing junction probes for profiling ~5000 human cassette alternative exons, we have identified 4 AS events that display pronounced inclusion level differences between normal and adenocarcinoma tissue in at least 80% of patients surveyed. These changes were confirmed by RT-PCR using the original 10 plus an additional 19 patient samples. Interestingly, all 4 of the alternative exons are located in genes that are linked to signaling pathways known to be deregulated in certain cancers. Moreover, these 4 AS events preserve frame and are conserved in mouse tissues, suggesting important functional roles. From the same dataset, a separate set of genes with transcript level changes were detected, consistent with previous findings that non-overlapping sets of genes are regulated at the AS and transcriptional levels, when comparing different tissues or corresponding tissues from different species. In addition to probe sets for profiling AS and transcript levels of the corresponding genes, our microarray contains probes to determine the transcript levels for 465 known and putative splicing factors. While significant changes in the expression levels of defined splicing factors were not detected, we observe changes in expression levels of 3 genes that contain RS domains, a feature of proteins that is predictive of a role in splicing. One of these genes is associated with the Notch pathway and the others are known tumor suppressor genes. We have confirmed that the change in AS for 1 of the target genes results in altered splicing at the protein level in addition to the RNA level changes. Work is in progress to characterize the functional role of this AS event using isoform-specific knockdown and overexpression. The increased expression of the exon-included protein isoform was evident in cell lines derived from both lung and colon cancer. We are currently determining if all 4 AS events occur in tumor tissue from breast and colon cancer patients. Also, we have expanded our profiling of human cancers by using higher density AS microarrays, and by using mRNA samples from additional normal and tumor-derived breast, colon and lung sources. Thus far, we have identified a set of conserved AS events that are consistently associated with lung adenocarcinomas. These are located in genes that function in signaling pathways that play important roles in tumorigenesis. Characterization of these AS events will advance our understanding of the role of splicing in human cancers and may also provide new targets for diagnostic applications as potential biomarkers. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2008;1(7 Suppl):B67.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.386 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Prevention ResearchSame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207