MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2324451018 · doi:10.2118/1109-0016-jpt

Comments: Weathering the Recession

2009· article· en· W2324451018 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Donnelly

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnergy
ThématiqueGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRecessionPetroleum industryBusinessGlobal recessionVolatility (finance)Service (business)EconomicsEconomyFinanceMarketingEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Editor's column A new report sheds light on how oil and gas firms have weathered the recession, and whether the firms" management believes that the industry is experiencing permanent structural changes in addition to the significant economic downturn. Released on the eve of the SPE Offshore Europe conference, the report concludes that companies generally fall into one of two categories and that the determining factor is company leadership and corporate culture. Although the entire industry has been affected by the recession and the cyclical nature of oil prices, the study sought to discover why some firms are more resilient and optimistic when facing economic and other challenges. The "Riding the Rapids" survey was put together by the Aberdeen School of Business and the Production Services Network consulting firm and was based on interviews with senior leadership from oil and gas operators and service companies. The research was then debated and discussed in panel sessions held in Aberdeen, Houston, Calgary, and Abu Dhabi. Companies were split on how they viewed current economic challenges. More than three-quarters of the companies said they had been affected in some way by the banking meltdown and the oil-price volatility of the past year and a half. But just over half (51%) claimed they were immune or only moderately affected by the current economic downturn and seemed to welcome the challenges the downturn posed. In sharp contrast, 49% of the companies surveyed "felt exposed and less in control of their destiny, stating they had been seriously or very badly affected by the current recession." The more optimistic firms saw the recession as only one of several contextual factors driving change in the industry. They also saw more signs of economic and industry recovery occurring in the second half of this year, which could lead to an industry rebound in 2010. Management in these companies were focused on restructuring their companies to become "leaner and meaner" in days to come to perform more efficiently. Not surprisingly, these firms often had a product line that was more economically inelastic, diversified offerings, and sound management practices and sturdy financials that were already in place. Some saw a practical opportunity to the boom and bust economic and price cycles the industry weathers—it allows the industry to periodically realign itself to current economic realities, streamline costs, and emerge as a more efficient sector. The more vulnerable cited the banking crisis in particular as a factor, as the lack of access to capital and funding harmed the ability to secure finance for projects and new developments and affected cash flow throughout the supply chain. They also cited a lack of skilled workers. The industry faced that problem before the recession and economic difficulties only made matters worse for some firms, which laid off workers even in light of the technical-talent shortage. Other firms in this category also complained about the lack of help and incentives from government, even as it bailed out other industries.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,697
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,273

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Petroleum TechnologyMême sujetGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchTravaux en français237 207